CC_Minutes_2007_1008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, October 08, 2007 Page 23 Councilmember Roe questioned Mr. Callaghan's written allegations that the in- formation provided was inadequate or inappropriate to City Code related to the PUD Section (Chapter 1008). City Attorney Anderson responded that the proposal was a concept that over time, this is what the college envisioned doing, but that it wasn't required; and the City Code PUD provisions allowed for flexibility of proposals, with every step of the way at every proposed development set forth, under the review and scrutiny, and reviewed separately by the appropriate unit of City staff, and other regulatory agencies (i.e., Watershed District; County; State); and further emphasized that the PUD Agreement, Section 4.1 (page 2, lines 13 - 32) stipulated that plans are in- consistent with the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms of the Agreement shall control, and any plans addressing items not specifically ad- dressed in the Agreement, shall be governed by the plans with respect to those items. Councilmember Ihlan read Mr. Callaghan's written comments regarding the set- back requirements for shoreland and proposed location of the field hottse. Mayor Klausing noted that this point had been raised several weeks ago; and it was noted at that time that the concept plans did not show an exact location, but a general location. City Attorney Anderson reiterated that Section 4.1 of the PUD Agreement indi- cated that the written terms will govern. Mr. Lindgren, on behalf of the college, concurred with Mr. Anderson's com- ments; and advised that the college understood the terms and final building design setback requirements. Councilmember Ihlan continued to express concerns regarding contradictory maps and agreement language related to proposed locations of future buildings and setback requirements. Mr. Darrow noted that this was a common issues related to concept mapping prior to the preliminary plan and site plan development; and assured Councilmembers, and the public, that staff would review all plans and proposals according to the text of this agreement; and that all buildings would meet setback requirements; and be subjected to the regular process of site plan review and provisions of City Codes and standards for all detailed plans as they're presented. Klausing moved, Pust seconded, suspending Rules of Procedure for the self-imposed meeting deadline of 10:00 p.m.; and extended the meeting until 11:00 p.m. to complete discussion of this item; and to consider Item 12 entitled, "Councilmember-initiated Items for Future Council Meet- ings."