Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 26, 2007 <br />Page 9 <br />Mayor Klausing opened and closed the Public Hearing at 7:57 p.m., with no one <br />appearing to speak. <br />Kough moved, Pust seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 10571 entitled, "Reso- <br />lution Directing the County Auditor to Levy Unpaid Water, Sewer and Other City <br />Charges for Payable 2008;" for charges in excess of ninety (90) days past due, <br />unless payments are received in the City of Roseville Finance Office by Decem- <br />ber 21, 2007. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Roe: Pust; Kough; Ihlan; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />11. Other Business Items <br />a. Discussion of the Comprehensive Plan and Consultant Update <br />Economic Development Associate Jamie Radel, and Comprehensive Plan Update <br />Project Manager Mark Koegler of HKGi Consulting, were present for this time, in <br />addition to several members of the Comprehensive Plan Update Steering Commit- <br />tee (Karen Shaffer; Gary Grefenberg; Al Sands). <br />Ms. Radel advised that the purpose of this Request for Council Discussion was <br />three-fold: to reaffirm the role of the Steering Committee; to provide direction on <br />the potential creation of subcommittees and timing impacts for preparation and <br />submission of the Plan Update to the Metropolitan Council by December 31, <br />2008; and to discuss potential appointment of a chair to the Steering Committee. <br />Ms. Radel advised that the Steering Committee had held two (2) monthly meet- <br />ings to-date; and that at the second meeting, the Committee discussed the possi- <br />bility of creating a subcommittee to review goals and policies related to the Imag- <br />ine Roseville 2025 process, with their purpose to determine which goals and poli- <br />cies should be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Radel noted the <br />diverse group represented on the Steering Committee; and the need for the City <br />Council to clearly define the roles to assure positive interaction between the <br />Committee, staff and the consultant on technical aspects of the update. <br />Ms. Radel addressed intent of a subcommittee to incorporate the softer parts of <br />the Imagine Roseville 2025 community visioning as an additional chapter to the <br />Comprehensive Plan to provide those aspirations and qualitative aspects to ensure <br />continued acknowledgement of those public participation strategies. <br />Ms. Radel advised that staff was not recommending creation of a subcommittee to <br />ensure that the already tight deadline was met, in addition to seeking extension of <br />the three (3) month review by neighboring communities, and submission to the <br />Metropolitan Council. Ms. Radel opined that a subcommittee would bog down <br />the system, require additional meeting time and costs for consulting services, af- <br />fecting the budget; and recommended that the Planning Commission hear recom- <br />