Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 19, 2007 <br />Page 8 <br />10. Other Business Items <br />a. Consider the Recommendation of Public Works, Environment and Trans- <br />portation (PWET) Commission to Re-establish a Pathways Planning Com- <br />mittee <br />Public Works Director Duane Schwartz, PWET Chair Ernie Willenbring, and <br />PWET Commissioner Jan Vanderwall were present for this discussion. <br />Mr. Schwartz provided a background on previous work by a Pathways Planning <br />Committee, review and potential revision or redevelopment of a Pathway Master <br />Plan; and rationale for re-establishment of a Committee, with a specific timeline <br />for action. Mr. Schwartz and the PWET Commission sought City Council direc- <br />tion on re-establishment of a Committee charged with updating and prioritizing <br />the Roseville Pathway Master Plan and direction to staff on how to proceed to <br />identify members to serve in this capacity. <br />Discussion included advantages for funding opportunities for pathway develop- <br />ment; priority criteria (i.e., Councilmember Kough's priority for a pathway on <br />Fairview Avenue from County Road B to Roselawn Avenue; and Councilmember <br />Ihlan's priority for a pathway north County Road C-2 to Dale, along Fairview <br />Avenue); and Kough -would you put priority on Fairview from County Road B <br />to Roselawn; and ways to find missing links and enhance pedestrian facilities. <br />Further discussion included timing of the study, and inclusion in, the Comprehen- <br />sive Plan Update for reference in that document; need to clarify that the commit- <br />teewas not along-term standing committee; involvement of youth in this commit- <br />tee, as well as others as appropriate, and their perspective on connectivity for pe- <br />destrians and bicycles; involvement of other agencies and parties; participation of <br />track and cross country students; and impacts of the new school transportation <br />policy and increased bike riders and pedestrians. <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke in support of the committee continuing, given the <br />prominence of this issue in the 2025 visioning process; however, concurred that <br />this phase should be completed before the Comprehensive Plan Update was sub- <br />mitted. <br />Mayor Klausing suggested that continuance of the committee could be revisited <br />once they completed this phase of their charge. <br />Councilmembers concurred on the need to proceed as recommended by staff in <br />the staff report dated November 19, 2007; requested that staff and the PWET so- <br />licit public input and make recommendation to the City Council on the make up <br />of the committee, rather than the Council proceeding through an application and <br />interview process, since this would be an ad hoc committee, rather than a long- <br />standing committee; and involving those who'd previously expressed interest or <br />ideas. <br />