Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, Apri121, 2008 <br />Page 21 <br />Councilmember Roe noted that staff had clarified that violators were warned, <br />through at least one of the notices, of the potential for an administrative ticket be- <br />ing issued; and offered his support for the motion. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Ihlan; Roe; Pust; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />Staff clarified with Ms. Bell Beckman that the Prosecuting Attorney contract ex- <br />pired at year end. <br />Ms .Bell Beckman advised that they would proceed at the discretion of the City <br />Council's policy decision; noting that the Council would be aware of the cases be- <br />ing prosecuted either way, and further noting that none of their other client cities <br />have such a clause in their contracts, recognizing that this provision was added in <br />2002, with only an average of two cases per year being processed through the <br />criminal court system. Ms. Bell Beckman noted that, even though Roseville was <br />their largest client city, they had the fewest citation cases brought to court. <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed her willingness to make the motion to clarify <br />contract language; however, with the express understanding that the City Council <br />be informed any time a citation was issued; and that staff would report to the City <br />Council after the six month trial period for a review of how the process was work- <br />ing out. <br />Ihlan moved, Klausing seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 10623 entitled, <br />"Prosecuting City Attorney Contract Change;" changing the current prosecuting <br />attorney contract to eliminate Item #18 of that contract until November 1, 2008, at <br />which time the issue will be reviewed again by the City Council. <br />Ayes: Ihlan; Roe; and Klausing. <br />Nays: Pust. <br />Motion carried. <br />Roll Call <br />c. City Council Agenda Order of Business <br />A brief discussion was held regarding revising the City Council Agenda order of <br />business for action items first, followed by presentations. <br />Councilmembers concurred that Agenda items 12 and 13 be rearranged. <br />Ihlan moved, Roe seconded, amendment of Roseville City Council Rules of Pro- <br />cedure Rule #3 (dated February 11, 2008) as follows: <br />Agenda item # 13 entitled, "Business Items - Presentation/Discussion" be moved <br />after current Item #12 entitled, "Business Items -Action." <br />