Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 16, 2008 <br />Page 17 <br />• Ms. Radel introduced Mr. Scott Martin Executi <br />ve Director of the <br />TCCCF, who facilitated discussion with Councilmembers and pro- <br />vided more detail on membership criteria; provision of only gap or <br />secondary financing; origination of the TCCCF as a subsidiary of the <br />Northland Foundation in Duluth in 1996 with a mission to provide <br />unique and collaborative models for economic development financing, <br />based on the model of the Minnesota Community Capital Fund that <br />serves 80 counties outside the seven county metropolitan area, thus <br />the need for serving the metro area with the TCCCF. <br />Further discussion included membership level based on capital in- <br />vestment, which is reimbursable after three years; enrollment costs; <br />partnerships with banks; make-up of current members; deposit of <br />funds in individual member escrow accounts managed by Wells <br />Fargo; loan examples to-date, with only one out of 1201oans default- <br />ing; and no-risk benefits to members with the TCCCF's sale of all <br />mortgages issued. <br />• Mr. Martin provided a bench handout of the current Board of Direc- <br />tors of the TCCCF for Councilmembers to solicit further input and <br />provide for additional research as it considered membership in this <br />fund. <br />c. Consider Request by Ficek Investment Company, LLC, owner of <br />621 Larpenteur Avenue, for a Rezoning and Variance to Roseville <br />City Code, Section 1005.01 (Parking Setbacks) to Allow the Rede- <br />velopment of the Property as an Assisted Living Facility with a <br />Parking Area Encroachment into the Required Setback from a <br />Right-of--Way (PF08-017) <br />Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd reviewed the request of Mr. Ficek to <br />rezone the property for development of an assisted living facility, at <br />621 Larpenteur Avenue. <br />Discussion included review of Planning Commission discussion and <br />action; proposed site plan and building setbacks required on the par- <br />cel; building configuration and possible alternatives; and other uses <br />not requiring rezoning, yet more intensive and detrimental to the <br />• neighborhood and traffic concerns. <br />