CC_Minutes_2008_0317 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, March 17, 2008 Page 19 Fairview Avenue side maybe difficult to acquire, based on past experience by the City; with a roadway proposed to supposedly develop internal parcels yet to be determined. Ms. McGehee opined that there was plenty of access to properties along Fairview without that linkage to accommodate getting outside traffic to the freeway, and didn't serve a public purpose for the citizens of Roseville. Mayor Klausing clarified, based on Councilmember Roe's observation, benefits detailed in the traffic study for the area that the Parkway would serve as a reliever for existing and future traffic, and that the request is for design work, not con- struction to look at the entire roadway as a practical matter in designing for the entire project area. Public Works Director Duane Schwartz concurred that this request is not for de- signing to construction level plans for the final segment until that became emi- nent, but that there was a distinct need to understand grades and drainage to match current and prospective needs during the initial design phase. Ihlan moved an amendment to the first bullet point, authorizing staff to solicit a Request for Proposals (RFP) to perform design work for the municipal infrastruc- ture improvements within the Twin Lakes redevelopment area for the noted road segments: amending the first bullet point to read: "Twin Lakes Parkway from Cleveland Avenue to Prior Avenue," rather than Twin Lakes Parkway from Cleveland Avenue to Fairview Avenue. Mayor Klausing declared the motion failed due to lack of a second. Ayes: Pust; Roe; and Klausing. Nays: Ihlan. Motion Carried. Roll Call b. Consider Request by McGough Development for Rezoning and General Con- cept Planned Unit Development for the PIK Terminal Site, 2690 Prior Ave- nue (PF08-001) Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon noted that the staff report, to be presented by City Planner Paschke, included additional information researched by staff, and revised by McGough, based on past discussions with the City Coun- cil and public comment. Mr. Trudgeon clarified that the Concept approval was based on a corporate campus, with an alternative if that concept was not market- able, for amulti-tenant office complex. Mr. Trudgeon noted that if the multi- tenant office were to transpire, staff would advocate that a new plan go through the Planning Commission process again to lay out impacts.