CC_Minutes_2008_0915 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, September 15, 2008 Page 23 Mr. Lloyd advised that staff was recommending installing a roof on the existing dumpster enclosure or constructing a new, enclosed structure. Staff recommended approval of REZONING of the property, based on the com- ments and findings of Section 5; and based on the comments and findings detailed in Sections 6 and 7, staff recommends approval of the PLANNED UNIT DE- VELOPMENT (PUD) and the related PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 8 of the staff report dated September 15, 2008. No one appeared from the public to speak on this issue. Pust moved, Roe seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1376 entitled, "An Ordi- nance Amending Title 10 of the Roseville City Code, Changing the Zoning Map Designation of Certain Real Property at 2845 Hamline Avenue from Shopping Center (SC) District to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with an Underlying Zoning of Limited Business (B-1) District;" based on the comments and findings of Section 5 of the project report dated September 15, 2008, as modified and des- ignated by staff at tonight's meeting. Roll Call Ayes: Roe; Ihlan; Willmus; Pust; and Klausing. Nays: None. Applicant Representative, Deb Zarback, Presbyterian Homes Ms. Zarback addressed the proposed trash enclosure, noting that the existing en- closure was brick on three sides, with the fourth side consisting of an ornamental gate facing the building. Ms. Zarback noted that, in order to install a roof on the existing building, they would need to build a separate structure to support the roof, as it had been determined that the existing brick work would not support the weight of a roof; and would require adding an additional four to five feet (4-5') in height to the structure to allow the bins to be opened. Ms. Zarback opined that the applicant felt the current structure was sufficient; and that additional costs of $10,000 to $30,000 were not warranted, necessitating the demolition or relocation of the existing structure, loss of a mature tree, and ability to provide for more frequent trash pick up if required. Councilmember Willmus concurred with the application; opining that the existing structure was nine feet (9') tall, and well concealed from the outside area, and didn't see a need for them to install a roof. Mr. Lloyd provided staff's rationale for requiring the roof for visual consistency with the other structure; potential, whether attached or detached, of items being blown about and out of the existing structure if equipment were not well-