Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 15, 2008 <br />Page 24 <br />maintained; and concern for the neighborhood in potential issues related to flying <br />debris. <br />Councilmember Roe noted the applicable code provision requirements on page 3, <br />Item 6.3, line 87 of the staff report. <br />Councilmember Pust sought clarification as to whether any specific complaints or <br />reports of blowing trash had been received by staff to-date; with Mr. Lloyd re- <br />sponding in the negative. <br />Councilmember Roe noted that any deviation would be downward; and ques- <br />tioned if the existing structure had to be replaced, if City Code would require <br />them to have it roofed at that time. <br />Mr. Lloyd suggested that the City Council include such a provision in the pro- <br />posed language of the PUD Agreement. <br />Klausing moved, Pust seconded, approval of the proposed Planned Unit Devel- <br />opment and Agreement, pursuant to Roseville City Code, Section 1008.10 (PUF <br />Procedure) and based on the comments and findings of Sections 5 - 7, and the <br />conditions of Section 8 of the project report dated September 15, 2008; amended <br />to revise language of Section 8.2.a of the staff report, and addition of a related <br />condition that any future substantial reconstruction or replacement of the exist- <br />ing trash enclosure would require trash handling equipment to be housed <br />within the principal structure or within a roofed structure, either attached to or <br />detached from the principal structure. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Roe; Ihlan; Willmus; Pust; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />d. Adopt the 2009 Preliminary Budget and Tax Levy <br />Finance Director Chris Miller reviewed the Preliminary Budget and Tax Levy <br />process before the City Council. Mr. Miller noted that a proposed Fee Schedule <br />was being presented to the City Council, but not for action, simply for informa- <br />tional purposes. <br />The proposed Preliminary Tax Levy and Budget, as proposed from the City Man- <br />ager-recommended 2009 Budget indicated an increase of $1,199,220 or 9.3% <br />overall. <br />Discussion included the percentage of personnel costs specific to this increase; re- <br />cent legislative impacts and capping of 3.9% for 2009-2011 for municipalities, <br />exclusive of the Equipment Certificates issued for the Skating Center improve- <br />ments and; and public safety levy provisions not within the cap; and impacts of <br />