My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2008_0922
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2008
>
CC_Minutes_2008_0922
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2008 12:00:07 PM
Creation date
10/28/2008 12:00:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/22/2008
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 22, 2008 <br />Page 17 <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Roe; Ihlan; Willmus; Pust; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />13. Business Items -Presentations, Discussions <br />a. Discuss Pathway Master Plan <br />City Engineer Debra Bloom and Public Works Director Duane Schwartz pre- <br />sented and highlighted the Pathway Master Plan - 2008 Update. <br />Mr. Schwartz noted those serving on the Pathway Advisory Committee from the <br />School District, City staff and community at large, including School District and <br />City Public Works, Environment, and Transportation Commission representative <br />Jan Vanderwall; City Parks and Recreation Commission representative Sarah <br />Brodt Lenz; Active Living Ramsey County Bicycle Committee member Ken Yo- <br />kanovich; Community-at-large representatives Sarah Heikkila; Mike Tracy; Lisa <br />Edstrom; Kathleen Cassen Michelson; Deb Parker; Bob Clarkson; Gregg Moder; <br />and City staff members Duane Schwartz, Debra Bloom, Lonnie Brokke, and Jeff <br />Evenson. <br />Ms. Bloom reviewed the background of the original plan as a result of the Vista <br />2000 process, as well as this year's update as a result of the Imagine Roseville <br />2025 community visioning process. Ms. Bloom reviewed the City's 104 miles of <br />pathways; results and attendance of approximately thirty (30) residents at a Public <br />Open House held in July of this year; rationale for pathway prioritization; and <br />priority recommendations to City Commissions in August resulting in this plan <br />now before the City Council. <br />Ms. Bloom defined pathway as a "non-motorized facility;" and reviewed the vari- <br />ous options and specific mileage of each in the community. Ms. Bloom noted that <br />the mission of the group and the updated Plan was to provide guidance in pathway <br />planning, and was not intended for interior park paths that should be developed as <br />part of the Master Park planning process. <br />Ms. Bloom identified benefits of pathways: safety; social; economic; transporta- <br />tion; health; environment -more emphasis on commuters, rather than just recrea- <br />tional; and the nearly-double mileage of pathways in the community since 1997. <br />Ms. Bloom reviewed considerations in pathway development and locations: <br />safety; connectivity; regional links; maintenance; aesthetics; regulation and en- <br />forcement; and reviewed policies and standards related to location; connection; <br />implementation; maintenance; and education/information/regulation. Ms. Bloom <br />noted that pathways signage was critical in meeting education, information, and <br />regulation criteria. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.