pm_090308 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Staff recommended approval of the request of the REZONING of 2990 and 2996 Cleveland Avenue N; approval of the PRELIMINARY PLAT; and GENERAL CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT for the property at 2990, 2996, 3008 and 3010 Cleveland Avenue N; based on the comments and findings, and the conditions as detailed in the project report dated August 6, 2008. Discussion included setback recommendations of staff in Condition a; staff rationale for recommending an increase in parking, when reduced parking fields and additional green space are more amenable, and based on its isolation from other areas in Twin Lakes for shared parking opportunities, no public ramp and the narrow width of Langton Lake Drive preventing on-street parking; and landscaping on the north and south side of the project property, with some tree retention of those species desirable and in good health, as well as retaining the natural landscaping to segue into the natural park and wetland areas. Staff noted that part of the negotiation process with the developer would be ongoing discussions regarding landscaping; and Commissioner Doherty suggested that if mature trees were available elsewhere on the property, and if possible, that they be relocated to the north side of the site. Further discussion included potential turnaround, depending on where City or developer-owned property was determined to be used, based on ongoing negotiations for access into the athletic field (park) area; staff suggested proposal supporting widening of the roadway after the curve for additional space, with the roadway twenty-four feet (24’) in width up to that point; dedication of the plat and right-of-way maintenance based on specific agreements yet to be drafted as a Public Improvement Contract; whether the north side should be designated as an outlot or not and rationale for such a designation, with the Public Works and Planning Departments supporting the roadway as proposed in the staff report as a right-of-way dedication, to incorporate landscaping to achieve the gateway goal rather than as an outlot; and advantages to have someone else (i.e., developer) responsible for maintaining the landscaping rather than an added City expense and use of staff resources. Additional discussion included trail connections to the path or sidewalk yet to be determined; park and wetland area designations; determination of a recommendation, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Commission, as to land or cash in lieu of for park dedication; ongoing discussions with staff and the developer, and preference expressed by the Commission, for a pathway behind the building to continue connections as a public amenity, as well as to encourage residents of the facility to walk outside with a connection to other buildings, and based on advocacy of the Parks and Recreation Commission as part of their recommendation process; and consideration of a possible transit connection off Cleveland and options for making the area and project more transit-friendly. Ms. Radel advised that staff would review plans to verify closest transit stops, and encourage developers to take that into consideration, based on support of Metropolitan Transit representatives and future plans in the area, and in light of future develop anticipated in the area. Commissioner Gottfried, based on expertise, noted that access into the site was limited to larger buses, with the exception of circulator and/or metro mobility vehicles; and suggested that the developer consider canopy heights when constructing the building to make sure they were of a height to accommodate such mass transit options for loading and unloading, as well as whether an off- street cut-out could be included, noting the difficulty in Cleveland Avenue being a County Road, and whether Metropolitan Transit was open to discussions on applicable transit options. Further discussion included the status of City Council approval of the Applewood Point II project, and validity of the Preliminary Plat, with Mr. Paschke advising that that situation was part of the rationale for including the Preliminary Plat approval