My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_100108
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2008
>
pm_100108
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2008 2:47:53 PM
Creation date
11/17/2008 2:47:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/1/2008
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, October 01, 2008 <br />Page 5 <br />b. PROJECT FILE 0004 <br />Review and approve a final draft of the City of Roseville’s Comprehensive Plan <br />Update <br />Chair Bakeman opened the Public Hearing for Project File 0004. <br />Chair Bakeman complimented staff on their preparation and presentation of this project <br />report and its specificities. <br />Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon <br />Mr. Trudgeon provided a brief review of the staff report dated October 1, 2008 on the <br />Draft 2030 Roseville Comprehensive Plan, in anticipation of Planning Commission <br />recommendation to the City Council for distribution of the Plan to adjacent governmental <br />jurisdictions, special taxing districts and school districts. Mr. Trudgeon advised that <br />Economic Development Associate Jamie Radel would present information on the process <br />to-date, the work of the Steering Committee, and specific chapters within the actual <br />Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Trudgeon advised that then he would review specific and <br />remaining issues of the Steering Committee that did not get consensus, having received <br />only majority support. <br />Mr. Trudgeon reviewed State Statute requirements for review by the eight (8) adjacent <br />municipalities as well as the City of Roseville’s review of their Plans. Mr. Trudgeon <br />referenced the aggressive timeframe detailed on page 5 of the staff report, and <br />anticipated additional Public Hearing at the December 3, 2008 Planning Commission <br />meeting, and City Council public comment and approval of the plan. <br />Economic Development Associate Jamie Radel <br /> <br />Ms. Radel briefly reviewed the process to-date as detailed in the staff report, including <br />hiring of Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKGI) by the City Council in September of 2007 <br />as consultant to facilitate this process; appointment of the Steering Committee; public <br />participation opportunities; review by City Advisory Commissions and the Housing and <br />Redevelopment Authority (HRA); and periodic Planning Commission and City Council <br />updates throughout the process. <br />Ms. Radel noted that the thirteen (13) member Steering Committee had held fourteen <br />(14) meetings; held two (2) Open Houses (one in March of 2008 with 70-80 in <br />attendance, and another in August of 2008 with 25-30 in attendance, many of whom were <br />Committee members, staff and consultants). <br />Ms. Radel noted that the plan consisted of eleven (11) chapters, and included a future <br />land use map; goals and policies; and proposed future land use designations. Ms. Radel <br />noted that the staff report detailed each of the eleven chapters by description, of content <br />and Steering Committee action, and included approval and/or majority/minority support of <br />those chapters, with the “Land Use” and “Using the Plan” chapters specifically lacking <br />consensus. <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted that the Steering Committee process had provided consensus <br />through discussion and compromise for the majority of the Plan; however, advised that <br />there were three remaining issues pending consensus: <br />? <br /> The role of master plans within the Plan and how they would be utilized; <br />? <br /> The definition of the Community Business future land use category and limitation of <br />their footprints at 100,000 square feet; and <br />? <br /> The future land use designation of the Har Mar Mall and SuperTarget (currently <br />designated “Regional Business” with proposal to revise to “Community Business.”) <br />Community Business <br />Mr. Trudgeon reviewed page 4-7 and 4-8 of the Comprehensive Plan and differentiations <br />between Regional Business (RB) and Community Business (CB) land use designations; <br />noting that the Steering Committee had voted 7/6 on several proposed amendments to <br />the language and whether to limit building footprints to 100,000 square feet. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.