My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_100108
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2008
>
pm_100108
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2008 2:47:53 PM
Creation date
11/17/2008 2:47:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/1/2008
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, October 01, 2008 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />Har/Mar and Target Land Use Designations <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted that the Committee voted 8/5 to change the proposed land use <br />designation for the HarMar and Target sites from Community Business to Regional <br />Business. <br />Master Plans <br />Mr. Trudgeon reviewed outstanding issues related to future Master Plans; three (3) <br />proposed options or policies as detailed on page 3 of the staff report. <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted, as part of the staff report, and identified as Attachment C, non-legal <br />comments dated September 15, 2008, from City Attorney Jay Squires and his <br />investigation of Master Plans and whether they should be adopted by reference into the <br />City’s Comprehensive Plan, based on definitions of Minnesota Statute 462.352, and <br />recommendations that the City Council needs to determine the proper use of Master <br />Plans. Mr. Trudgeon concurred with City Attorney Squires’ conclusion that inclusion of <br />master plans in the Comprehensive Plan results in greater limits on specific development <br />proposals that may arise, and that they may restrict the marketplace-driven development <br />and/or redevelopment. Mr. Trudgeon opined that this decision – either way – would not <br />be easy to determine, but that it needed to be done, and the decision needed to be <br />explicit. <br />Discussion ensued on the ramifications if the City did not meet the December 31, 2008 <br />submittal deadline to the Metropolitan Council, based on these few outstanding items. <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that the City could still make application, but would no longer be <br />eligible to receive Livable Communities grant funds through the Metropolitan Council; and <br />noted that the City may be best advised to apply for an extension even if it was later <br />determined that it was not needed. <br />Further discussion included the steps and process necessary, following approval of the <br />Comprehensive Plan by the Metropolitan Council, to put City Codes and controls (i.e., <br />zoning ordinances and land use designations) in place (9 month timeframe). <br />Further discussion included implementation strategies in the “Using the Plan” Chapter, <br />with staff noting that they would further refine that chapter to ensure all consensus <br />comments of the Steering Committee were included before City Council review; <br />submission of further typographical and/or grammatical corrections by individual <br />Commissioners to staff for inclusion in the final DRAFT document; management of <br />adjacent jurisdiction’s review timeframes to encourage their quick response times; and <br />those areas of interest to those jurisdictions (i.e., jointly shared corridors and road <br />connections). <br />Additional discussion included more user-friendly document represented in the update <br />than the previous plan; with Commissioners thanking staff and the consultants in their <br />efforts to refine and streamline the Plan. <br />Chair Bakeman recessed the meeting at approximately 8:13 p.m. and reconvened at approximately <br />8:23 p.m. <br />Public Comment <br />Chair Bakeman briefly reviewed the process for the Public hearing and requested <br />cooperation of those present. <br />Various written comments had been received by staff and were included in the project <br />report dated October 1, 2008. <br />Additional written comments received by staff following preparation and distribution of the <br />project report were provided as bench handouts, and are attached hereto and made a <br />part thereof. Those documents are as follows: <br />? <br />September 24, 2008 Minority Report <br /> containing two (2) recommendations, <br />regarding “Classification of Target and HarMar sites as Regional Business” land use <br />designation, and “Master Plans as part of the Comprehensive Plan;” and <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.