My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2008_1201
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2008
>
CC_Minutes_2008_1201
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/24/2008 11:47:44 AM
Creation date
12/24/2008 11:47:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/1/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Truth in Taxation pgs 1-8 <br />Regular City Council Meeting pgs 9-15 <br />Monday, December O1, 2008 <br />Page 6 <br />comes; and suggested that perhaps those at the upper level of management within the <br />City may not necessarily need to receive a 3.5% COLA. <br />Mr. Grefenberg further addressed comparisons with the Shoreview Community Center <br />and user fees 24% higher than Shoreview residents due to their non-resident status; and <br />questioned whether the City didn't need to seriously consider increasing the fees for non- <br />residents at the Skating Center rather than continuing to subsidize operations at an <br />amount estimated by him to be $64,000. <br />Mr. Grefenberg compared proposed levy increases with the Cities of Falcon Heights and <br />Shoreview, as well as the City of St. Paul. Mr. Grefenberg expressed confidence that the <br />City Council could back off staff training for one year without dire consequences;. ques- <br />tioned why the City needed to continue to pay for magazine subscriptions for the Skating <br />Center; and advised that he had a list of 14 proposals to present to staff and the City <br />Council of other cost saving suggestions for their consideration. Mr. Grefenberg sug- <br />gested that the City consider freezing any non-salary costs for the remainder of the year <br />as another cost-saving option. Mr. Grefenberg provided his suggestions to City Manager <br />Malinen as a bench handout for distribution to City Councilmembers. <br />Mr. Grefenberg suggested that the City Council appoint a citizen group, chaired by Fi- <br />nancial Advisor and former City Councilmember Dean Maschka, who would meet 2-3 <br />times, to provide an independent review of the City's spending and revenue situations. <br />Mr. Grefenberg opined that residents received good services; however, it was time to <br />start prioritizing those services. Mr. Grefenberg opined that he would like others outside <br />City Hall to give Councilmembers and staff some suggestions. <br />Mr. Grefenberg asked what major new programs or program expansions were represented <br />by this proposed budget increase. <br />Mayor Klausing responded to Mr. Grefenberg's query by clarifying that there were no <br />new programs or expanded programs proposed at all in the proposed budget. <br />Mr. Grefenberg opined that, since much of the budget was tied to personnel costs, step <br />increases should be frozen for one year, and should only be discretionary, not a given. <br />Mr. Grefenberg further noted that the City of Shoreview depended on the contracted po- <br />lice services of Ramsey County rather than their own Police Department; and suggested <br />that this might be a larger discussion question beyond tonight's consideration. <br />Mr. Grefenberg further opined that a number of people who would suffer from this pro- <br />posed levy increase would be renters; and that it would only add to their monthly ex- <br />penses and impact them based on the City Council's decisions. <br />Mr. Grefenberg asked that, if not now, he would like a future response as to why an addi- <br />tional $400,000 was being proposed for the City's Police Department budget. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.