My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_0105
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_0105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2009 12:28:54 PM
Creation date
1/15/2009 12:28:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/5/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, January O5, 2009 <br />Page 8 <br />Councilmember Roe noted that no formal action was necessary; that the Rules of <br />Procedure would stay in effect as written until changed. <br />b. Discuss City Council Liaisons <br />City Manager Malinen noted that this item was being brought forward for discus- <br />sion purposes with the new City Council now in place. <br />Discussion included past discussions with no indication for additional and/or <br />more formalized liaisons; lack of general consensus for designated liaisons for <br />advisory commissions to the City Council; perceptions of whether Council liai- <br />sons were voting members or their influence on discussions at commission levels; <br />and how the City Council related as a body to other government groups and agen- <br />cies (i.e., School Board). <br />Further discussion included past history and criticisms from City Council liaisons <br />to the Planning Commission; education of the public and outside agencies of spe- <br />cific and appropriate contacts within City government for their particular concerns <br />and/or questions, and whether a specific contact person was indicated. <br />Mayor Klausing opined that he preferred advisory commissions to provide him <br />with their honest and independent opinions and recommendations. <br />Councilmember Roe opined that if the City Council is paying attention to advi- <br />sory meetings through their personal attendance at meetings or review of those <br />meetings via tape-delay, they were aware of their discussions regarding specific <br />topics. Councilmember Roe noted that it may make sense to have a designated <br />point of contact for those advisory commissions to help facilitate communication <br />between the City Council and advisory group; however, clarified that he was not <br />advocating for such a contact person. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that Councilmembers should not be on advisory <br />commissions; and offered that she was willing to discuss the City Council liaison <br />role on the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) as well if the City <br />Council so desired. Councilmember Pust further opined that the City's advisory <br />commissions were doing great work; however, the City Council was not always <br />aware of their discussions outside their annual report to the City Council, and <br />questioned whether there was a role for a communication link between the City <br />Council and commissions. <br />Councilmember Johnson opined that perhaps the Chairs of each commission <br />should serve as liaisons to the City Council to make the City Council more acces- <br />sible to their specific commission. <br />Mayor Klausing expressed interest in Councilmember Johnson's concept, and <br />sought additional detail and how that liaison position would best function. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.