2009_0330_ Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Control by elites remains a problem in the case of a relatively new planning or regulatory tool such as form-based code. This is true because form-based code relies upon what has been called "responsibilitization"—the politically inspired imposition of autonomy upon those who had previously lacked such autonomy.103 Responsibilitization is seen in a number of areas, such as criminal enforcement via third party policing.104 It is part of a broader societal move away from Keynesian welfarism, los which was exemplified by provision of services, and towards neo- liberal governance.lo6 The key feature of neo-liberal governance is the way in which individuals are incorporated into the process of managing their own lives as an enterprise via rational '03 Jane I. Collins, Transnational Labor Process and Gender Relations: Women in Fruit and Vegetable Production in Chile, Brazil and Mexico, in Perspectives on Las Americas: A Reader in Culture, History, and Representation 160, 167 (Felix V. Rodriguez & Matthew C Guttmann eds. 2003). '04 Lorraine Mazerolle & Janet Ransley, Third Party Policing 52 (2006). One frequently discussed form of responsibilitzation is third party policing. Third party policing is a style of policing involving many different persons or entities, such as private individuals or community groups, who exercise regulatory controL Id. at 2. Those involved may be willing or unwilling partners. Id. This is because included within the regulatory framework for such policing schemes are mechanisms for the police to coerce participation by the threat of civil or administrative sanctions for the failure to participate. Kristian Williams, Our Enemies In Blue: Police And Power In America 241-242 (2004). Continued crime after the implementation of this form of responsibilitization is often seen not as a failure of police but of the citizens who are made "partners" in third party policing. Id. In like manner, turning planning processes over to citizens, particularly those ill-equipped to manage such processes, may easily make citizens rather than government liable for planning failure. 'os John Maynard Keynes was a social democrat who greatly influenced the formation of the welfare state after World War II as a direct affront to the economic liberalism that had flourished in the United States from the 1800s until the early 1900s . Keynes's theories challenged the notion that economic liberalism, characterized by an unrestrained market, little government intervention in economic and social policy, and reliance upon individual private initiative, was best for the success of a nation. See e.g. Sanford F. Schram, Praxis for the Poor: Piven and Cloward and the Future of Social Science in Social Welfare 213 (2002). 106Id at 23 30