2009_0511_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

�07 Ro�aid G. Rumpsa, 2201 �'erris Lane (Ferriswood Apartments) �08 Mr. Rumpsa concurred with the comments of Mr. Coyle, opining that density was ff�e 109 rri.ajor issue of concern; and opined that this proposed use was such a dramatic �1Q deviation, and that it was inconsistent with fhe adjacent properties. Mr. Rumpsa asked 1� 1 that residents' quality of life be enriched, not reduced. Mr. Rumpsa further addressed �� exist[ng iraffic volumes on County Road B between Fa.ir�iew and Cleveland A�enues, �� 3 and impacts wit� additiona� units in that area. �i4 Alle�e Wiley, 2220 Midland Grove Road, #206 1 � 5 Ms. Wiley concurred with Mr. Rumpsa's traffic concerns; and fur#her addressed the �1� proposed exit road from the devefopm�nt site onto Midland Grove Road, and negative �1� impacts to access abiEity, in addition to emergency �ehicfe consideratians. 118 Russ Sherer, 2203 Ferris Lane �� Mr. 5herer ex�ressed concern related to egress frorr� F�rriswood, when heading east of 12� Highway 36 and exiting on Cleveland and the need to crass over three (3) lanes of traffic 12� t.o make a left hand turn onto County Roa.d B. 122 Dorothy Kunze, 2220 M.idland Gro�e Road, #205 �23 Ms. K.unze providetE comment, o�ining thai tax re�enue should not be the only 3�4 consideration for the City, but also that of aesthe#ics; and apined that this was too large of 125 a building on tao sma!! of a plot of land, and that this was not what the Roseville residents 12� have known for a considerable amount of time. 127 Eileen Stack, RfV, 222D Ferris L.ar�e 128 Ms. Stack, as a Fai.th Community Nurse at the Church of Corpus Christi, noted that she 12� had clients in many area haines; and that based on the curreni economy, they were 13� continuing to live in their homes, rather than move, due to their inability Eo sell their 131 homes; and opined ti�at tF�is should be of major concern to the City. 132 Bob Stoika, 2220 Midland Grave Road, #106 133 Mr. Stoika concurred with cancerns expressed about whether this praposai would f# in �34 with the neighborhood; opining that Midland Grove was a park-iike sefting; and thaf this �35 project would not fit in. �36 Vijaya [SP) Pothapragada, 225d Midland Gro�e Road, #1U5 737 Mr. Pothapragada a�dressed Section 6.1 of the staff repori, detailing traffic and daily trips �3� based on the proposed number of units; and asked that other complications be �39 considered (i.e., employee and staff parki�g needs; visitor parking; deliveries ta the site; 14� and emergency arrbulance servi.ces) and those additionaE traffic impacts to the 1�1 neighhorhood. 142 Fre.d Ghristianson, 2220 lV�iciland Grove ta3 Mr, Christianson, as a former Planner in the United States and Canada, applauded the �44 effor#s af those speakers and their eloquence. Mr. Christianson asked that the �a5 Commission remember that their decisians were Iong-term; and concurred with the �a� comments of Attorney Peter Coyle. �47 Ste�e Enzler, representing family, 9995 W County Road B � 4� Mr. Enzler read an e-mail from Frank Vllaltan of the Roseville Hisiorica] Society, related ta �49 ihe histaricai nature of his family property, idenfified on the Heritage Trail, �#47, and the �50 lack of notice of the Historical Society of any proposed activities on this site; and future 151 notice in accordance. Mr. Vllalton's comments addressed concerns with mass and the 1�2 need to hanor the green space indicative of this property. 153 Mr. Enzler's personal comments inciuded apining t�at the current proposal may rr�ore 15� accurately reflect future use of the property; that it was apparentiy not the intent of the 155 Comprehensive Plan to eliminate his single-family residential pro�erty. Mr. Enzler opined 1�6 that Mr. Mueller was aftempting to undermine code limits by use of the pUD applicatian; �5� and further opined that the building s#ill remained massive in relationship to his property 158 and home; and t�at his property would experience dramatic and negative impacts to �59 sunlight, air and view; and opined that it seemed to be a reasanable ciaim that this could 16o damage the vafue of their home in addition to iF�eir quality af life.