Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />�i <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />] [} <br />11 <br />I� <br />i <br />1? <br />1t� <br />�S <br />L F� <br />i� <br />I� <br />�9 <br />�[� <br />�1 <br />2� <br />�1 <br />��� <br />�� <br />�-����-� <br />� r�����: <br />I��n� <br />:Hourly cost of staff (projected union rate) <br />'Hourly cost of supervision <br />-Coverage over vacation periods <br />Coverage over sick periods <br />Cost of training <br />Value of workers comp avoidance <br />Value of unemployment comp avoidance <br />Total monthly cost <br />L - <br />In-House Staff Contract Services�� <br />��`� ;�:91r $7737/amo. � $��_���1u $8594.57 <br />2 I�r/da� @ $35.00 <br />$1,5���'rn�mlt <br />Staff pulled from <br />other duties <br />Assume 1 dayl�o <br />$216 cost to another <br />area <br />Staff pulled from <br />other duties <br />Assume �/z daylmo <br />$108 cost to another <br />area <br />$129-lmanth <br />City liability <br />City liability <br />1 hrlday @ $35.00 <br />$`75 8/�nonth <br />Included <br />Included <br />Included <br />Contractor liability <br />Contractor liability <br />• • • - - -•--.� .. .. . .. . . ._ . ...--- <br />+' +`+� -- T--... _ �} . .._� <br />��k�7���3l�[_._. _ _F.�_ _�.�����=� }_��� <br />From an out-of-pocket expense perspective, the cost of providing these services is very similar <br />on a per hour basis, comparing full-time city staff to contract costs. The City avoids certain <br />liabilities utilizing contract staff and can request new personnel if satisfactory performance is not <br />achieved. Staff feels these services, which are currently at bare necessity level, are provided <br />most consistentlyutilizing a contract service. Staff recommends continuing the existing <br />contractual relationship with Marsden at this time. <br />Financial Implications: The extension of the service contract falls within the proposed 2007 <br />budgeted amount. Staff checked with other providers as to their service rates and found <br />Marsden's rates competitive. We found no evidence to indicate a benefit to going to bid at this <br />time. <br />Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends a two year extension of the existing janitorial <br />service contract with �a�'sde� Janitorial Services at a monthly cost of $8,594.57. <br />RECOMI��NDED COUNCIL ACTION: <br />Motion extending the current contract for janitorial services for City facilities with �a�'sde� <br />Janitorial Service through February 9,2009, at a not-to-exceed increase of 4 percent per year. <br />Prepared by: Patrick Dolan and Duane Schwartz <br />