Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting — DRAFT Minutes <br />Monday, Apri123,2007 <br />Page 26 <br />� Mayor HIausing suggested that the City Council consider remaining agenda <br />� items at this time to allow uninterrupted discussion of financial and budget <br />� policies. Councilmembers concurred. <br />a <br />� <br />�} <br />1 <br />� <br />�� <br />] i� <br />d. Audit Committee — Discussion of an Audit Committee <br />Mayor Klausing suggested tabling this item indefinitely until Coun- <br />cilmember Kough was able to participate in the discussion. Mayor <br />Klausing noted that the issue se�m�d to be whether a Council sub- <br />committee or the entire Council serve as the Audit committee. <br />l�� City Manager Malinen advised that staff had incorporated previous <br />]�? auditor findings and had corrected those situations; and was proceed- <br />]:� ing in conformity with those previous findings, including conducting a <br />14 training for all employees and incorporating any employee recognition <br />] � at that time. <br />i� <br />7� <br />1� <br />1'� <br />2{? <br />21 <br />2.� <br />�� <br />�� <br />��� <br />2�; <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�€] <br />31 <br />32 <br />�� <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that the current audit was nearing com- <br />pletion, and personally opined her preference that that audit would <br />recognize the steps already taken and progress made by the City to <br />address previous findings. Councilmember Ihlan further opined that it <br />was her personal preference that a formal and ongoing Audit and Fi- <br />nance Committee be established for the purpose of reviewing and <br />mal�ing recommendations related to the type of policy discussions be- <br />ing held by the Council tonight. <br />e. Legislative Advocacy — Discussion of Development of 2008 Legis- <br />lative Advocacy Schedule <br />Councilmember Pust opined that the suggested program, as prepared <br />by staff, appeared organized and efficient, and suggested that the leg- <br />islative policy not be considered until June, as recommended in the <br />staff report dated Apri123, 2007 and attached proposed 2008 Legisla- <br />tive Advocacy Program timeline. <br />3� It was Council consensus that staff provide the Council with a set pro- <br />�S gram, as outlined, on a regular basis as a matter of City Council action <br />�� and activity throughout the year. <br />LJ i <br />3�3 <br />3{� <br />Councilmember Pust stipulated that consensus action of the Council <br />as referenced above, not be interpreted by Department Heads as an <br />