2007_0514_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

John went around the room and asked those in attendance to state whether or not they were supportive of instituting multiple residential zoning districts in Roseville. The following is a summary of participants' responses. Grou Member General Thou hts on Multi le Zonin District Conce t Darrel Su ort of multi le district zonin with small lots, but not lar e lots Mary Supportive of multi-district zoning with less than 85 ft as a distinct zone lus small/lar e districts Gary Supportive of multiple zoning districts, but not as applied Dan Supportive of multiple zoning districts with further study of how it is a lied Vivian Su ortive of multi le zonin districts as lon as its a lied in context Barb Su ortive of multi le zonin districts Jeanne Possibl su ortive de endin on how it is a lied Joe Su ortive if lar e district is "slidin " Jim Could be supportive with neighborhood buy-in and if unintended conse uences identified. Currentl not in favor of lar e lots. Amy* Wants more council and community input on subdivisions than zones would ermit. *Not an Advisory Group member. During this discussion, a number of issues surrounding neighborhood character were brought up by members of the group. Gary presented the Advisory Group with a draft document that he prepared discussion neighborhood character. (This document is attached to this Meeting Summary.) When the group was asked if they support a recommendation to the City Council to further study the issue of neighborhood character, a majority of the group was unsupportive of this recommendation. John asked the group if there were types of zoning districts the group could identify as those they definitely, possibly, or under no conditions want to see as recommendations. Those that the group generally identified as "definitely" included the "standard R-1" (requirements directed by the current R-1 zone) and a Shoreland District. The Advisory Group asked that staff do additional research on legal requirements surrounding the pre-19591ots that are currently legal, non-conforming lots and those post-1959 non- conforming lots that are smaller than current standards allow. Additional topics that were covered within the multiple zoning district conversation included lot recombination and house design standards. Members of the group did not support prohibiting lot recombination. However, the group had a split opinion with several members feeling strongly for and several members feeling strongly against creating housing design standards April 92 Meeting Summary Page 2 of 2