My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0514_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0514_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:17 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:22:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
➢ Majoritv Recommendation: Do not create a large lot zoning district because there <br />are so few parcels <br />➢ Minoritv Recommendation (2 members�: Do not create a large lot zoning district <br />as long as there is a mechanism in place to allow the Planning Commission and <br />City Council to consider neighborhood context in their decision making. <br />Lot Design Issues (Subdivision and/or PUD Ordinance) <br />✓ Cluster homes and other types of nonstandard subdivision <br />➢ Recommendation: Establish a variance process in the Subdivision Code or a <br />simplified/streamlined single-family residential PUD process for subdivisions that <br />considers clustered housing, impervious surface, natural resource preservation <br />(inc. trees, wetlands, unique topography, and habitat), set backs, lot <br />size/dimensions, and coverage. <br />■ Evaluate costs of the existing PUD process as they pertain to single-family <br />residential PUDs <br />✓ Public versus private roads <br />➢ Recommendation: Acceptable to have single-family lots served by private streets <br />if approval is conditioned on legal mechanism put in place to handle seasonal and <br />ongoing maintenance and that the street cannot be gated or restrict traffic <br />(tentative) <br />■ Corner lot house siting issue <br />✓ Lot dimension and size, including smaller and/or larger required lot size <br />➢ See recommendations under community-wide uniformity <br />✓ Lot recombination <br />➢ The group determined it had no desire to limit recombination of lots (is this a <br />recommendation) <br />✓ Lot shape <br />➢ Consensus Recommendation: Lot lines should be perpendicular [or radial for a <br />cul-de-sac] to the front property line unless there are specific natural or <br />environmental features that would prohibit this. <br />➢ Majoritv Recommendation: Flag lots should not be prohibited. <br />➢ Minoritv Recommendation (2 members� Flag lost should be prohibited. <br />Zoning Issues <br />✓ House siting options <br />✓ Coverage ratios <br />✓ Lot setbacks, including a possible sliding scale (e.g. bigger house, bigger setback) <br />✓ House scale <br />➢ Recommendation: Consider reviewing lot standards for the small lot zoning <br />district, including building height maximums and minimum setbacks. <br />Other Standards/Ordinances <br />April 99 Meeting Summary Page 2 of3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.