My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0806_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0806_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:30 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:29:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Co�a�cii Meeting <br />I1�onday, �uly 23, 2007 <br />Page 41 <br />1 Councilmember Pusi sought cla�rxficatzon on mitigation plans and �hez� <br />2 timeframe: what was needed now to accommoda�e improvements a�i <br />3 the college and what was scheduled io take p�ace by 2D18 — 2030; and <br />4 the infient a� ihe college �o particzpate in or fund traffc mitigation is- <br />5 sues. <br />6 <br />7 Mr. Lindgren responded �hat mitigation was pxovided for immedia�e <br />8 imp�rovement� as well as aver time ta fi�I� build-out; and would be <br />9 driven by �raffie engineers for bacl�ground traffic growth ather than <br />10 the Co�lege, as well as impravements on campus. <br />11 <br />12 1V�r. Schwartz advised that, from his reco��ect�on of discussions with <br />13 �he Minnesota Department of Transportation {MnDOT), the reviewing <br />14 Ci�y consultan�, and �h� College's eonsultant, miizgat�ons strategies <br />15 wou�d be arequired upon the addi�ion of the f rat tra�fic--generating fa� <br />I6 cility; and specific language would be incorporated in�o th� PUD <br />� 'i Agreement. <br />18 <br />19 I1�ayor Klausing re�ocused discussion �o whe�her �he �AW was suffi- <br />20 cient or if �'urther study through an E�� was required. Mayor Klausing <br />2�. not�d �hat sp�cific i��ms could be addr�ssed as part o� the PUD <br />22 Agreement, and wauld co�ne befare the City Council for ref nement at <br />23 a future date. <br />24 <br />25 Counei�member Pust noted thai she understood the proeess and steps; <br />26 however, she was analyzing whether miiigation steps and their �iming <br />2'7 were sufficient as part o�'her cons�dera�ian a�the EAW. <br />28 <br />29 Mr. Paschke noted that he was uncertain whe�her the EAW could ,spe- <br />30 cifical�y identi�y time and da�e, and �riggering mechanisms to achieve <br />3� comp�ianee with mitigation �actors; however, he nated tha� �he EAW <br />32 la�d out p�ans to addres� thas�; and that the PUD was the �and use ap- <br />33 proval document that solidified achievement of those mitigatic�n fac- <br />34 iors, whiie �he EAW served as a genexa� dacumenfi or guzde. <br />35 <br />35 City Attorney Anderson advised that during ihe in�ormation gathering <br />37 process and a detennina�ion that potential envzronmenial a�fects are <br />38 subject io mitigat�on by ongoing xegulafory efforts, and when de�azls <br />39 are avai�abl� indicating such mitiga�ion strategies, they can be in- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.