My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0123_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0123_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 4:38:12 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:30:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i Overall, the Planning Commission recommends an approach that incorporates <br />� different forums and communication methods to obtain input from a broad range of <br />- i residents and stakeholders. The recommended approach also includes ongoing <br />� "check-ins"with the City Council as the process unfolds. The following are various <br />—�� ways the City would take to inform and involve the �ublic. They are described in <br />_#� more detail later in this document under "Public Participation Methods". <br />� • Public hearings <br />� ■ Surveys or neighborhood meetings <br />� • City's website, including email response forms <br />_�.�� + Mailable Compact Disks <br />� . City Hall Open House meetings <br />�� * Comprehensive Plan Update - Planning Commission meetings <br />=1 � ■ Goa�x���tteelBoardlGouncil Meetings <br />�i ■ Television via Cable Channel 16 <br />��r ■ Media and press releases <br />�� ■ Quarterly articles in the City Newsletter <br />-F � . Legal Notices in the City's Official Newspaper, Roseville Review <br />�� ■ Presentation to professional and civic groups <br />��� + One-on-one meetings with government and public service officials <br />� � Historical Perspective <br />��? The idea of creating a city plan began in the 1950's and was updated in the 1960's as well <br />� a as being rewritten in 1979, 1994, and 1998. Since 1998 the plan has been updated at least <br />�a biannually. The 1994 Plan was based on the work of the Vista 2000 committee of 1992, <br />�� made up of elected officials and local citizens. This committee decided the best way to <br />��� create a plan was to create a"vision" of Roseville as they thought is should look in year <br />?; 2000. A public participation plan was adopted which created a series of subcommittees <br />�� and open meetings prior to hearings and adoption of the "vision" by City Council. The <br />��z� "vision" created and adopted in 1992 evolved into the goals and policies of the 1994 <br />�� Plan. Public participation was a key component in the creation of that plan. Monthly <br />3 I public hearings and meetings were held by the Planning Commission. The public <br />3.� participation plan that follows has similar public participation methods that the City has <br />�a been using from the beginning, but now also includes newer technologies such as the <br />aa cable TV broadcasts and the internet web sites that provide more immediate access to the <br />� � public. <br />?� Planning Process and Public Participation <br />_- The planning process is divided into sections or componenis. The City's Plan is compiled <br />; I� and coordinated by the Planning Commission, based on the work, vision, and feedback of <br />a•�� the City Council, the city's official committees and boards and staff as well as fro�n the <br />�� public. Many of the components n�a� be done siinultaneously <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.