My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0130_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0130_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 8:29:28 AM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:31:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
664
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Councii Study Sess�on — 01123/Q6 <br />DRAFT N,Cinutes - Page 13 <br />Qwest r�orked in a City right�of way, adjustments mzght <br />wan� �o be made to Ci�y Code, applying permit restrictions to <br />avoid insta�latzon a� fber optic cabling, rathe� ihan simply <br />telephone cabling. <br />3. Fire Reliaf Assoc�ativn Presentatian Regarding Pension Fire �telief <br />Program Association <br />No discussion at this time. <br />4. Discuss Comprehensive Plan Process {PF 3692} <br />Communi�y Developmen� Director D�nnis Welsch <br />Community Development Director We�sch introduced Planning <br />Comrnzsszon Vice Chair Mary Bakeman, and boih provided <br />background on the proposed upcoming Comprehensive P�an <br />revisions. Mr. Welsch noted that goa� setting and p�anning wexe <br />an integra� part of each ci�y's responsibility; and that by 2008, all <br />communities zn the metz�opo��ian areas were to submit an up-to- <br />date Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review <br />and approva�. Mr. Welsch and Ms. Sakeman sought City Counci� <br />dzarection on how �o prepare a participation plan and who to <br />invo�ve in the prneess. <br />Planning Commiss�on Vice Chair Mary S�keman <br />Ms. Bakeman noted that she was a s�rong p�aponent of public <br />participation; and reeognized the inter�st o� citiz�ns in the <br />previous process, Vista 2000, its promotion and resulis. Ms. <br />Bakeman further noted, however, the �ime �equired for an <br />intensive pub�ic pxocess, and the n�ed for immedia�e ac�ion to <br />initia�e �hat process. Ms. Bakeman sought Counci� dircct�on i� a <br />community process were pre�erred and noted that the pracess <br />cou�d take from 1-2 years to complete. <br />Thrc� altez-nat�ves were presented to the City Council for their <br />review and recomm�ndatians. <br />1} Altema�ive �: C�tizen involvemen� {through Commissions, <br />Boards and staf� and visioning to �dent�£y ma,jor <br />comrnunz�y issues in the n�xt ten years; and determina�ion <br />of what direetion the commun�ty shou�d �ake. <br />2) A��ez-native 2: No comprehensive planning und�rtak�n by <br />the Comm�ss�ons and Boards this year, pending the <br />autcome of the Counci�'� visionzng, team building and goal <br />Discuss <br />Comprahens�ve <br />Plan Process <br />(PF 3692) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.