Laserfiche WebLink
24. Dust, Odors and Noise. Dust, odors, and construction noise need not be addressed in an <br />AUAR, unless there is some unusual reason to do so. The RGU might want to discuss as <br />part of the mitigation plan, however, any dust control or construction noise ordinances in <br />effect. If the area will include or adjoin major noise sources a noise analysis is needed to <br />determine if any noise levels in excess of standards would occur, and if so, to identify <br />appropriate mitigation measures. With respectto traffic-generatednoise, the noise <br />analysis should be based on the traffic analysis of item 21. <br />25. Sensitive resources: Archeological, historic, and architectural resources. For an AUAR, <br />contactwith the State Historic PreservationO�fice is required to determine whether there <br />are areas of potential impacts to these resources. If any exist, an appropriate site survey of <br />high probability areas is needed to address the issue in more detail. The mitigation plan <br />must include mitigation for any impacts identified. Prime or unique farmlands. The extent <br />of conversion of existing farm�ands anticioated in the AUAR should be described. If anv <br />farmland will be preserved by special protection programs, this should be discussed. <br />Designated par�s, recreation areas. or trails. If develovment of the AUAR will interfere or <br />change the use of ariy existing such resource, this should be described in the AUAR. <br />The RGU may also want to discuss under this item any proposed parlcs, recreation areas, <br />or trails to be developed in conjunction with development of the AUAR area. <br />Scenic views and vistas. Any impacts on such resources present in the AUAR should be <br />addressed. This would include both direct physical impacts and impacts on visual <br />quality or integrity. "EAW Guidelines: contains a list of ���i�la scenic resources (page <br />20). <br />26. Adverse Visual Impacts. If any non-routine visual impacts would occur from the <br />anticipated development, this should be discussed here along with appropriate mitigation. <br />27. Compatibility with Plans. The AUAR must include a statement of certification from <br />the RGU that its comprehensive plan complies with the requirements set out at <br />44103610, subpart 1. The AUAR document should discuss the proposed AUAR area <br />development in the context of the comprehensive plan. If this has not been done as part of <br />the responses to items 6,9, � 8,21, and others, it must be addressed here; a brief synopsis <br />should be presented here if the material has been presented in detail under other items. <br />Necessary amendments to comprehensive plan elements to allow for any of the <br />development scenarios should be noted. If there are any management plans of any other <br />local, state, or federal agencies applicable to the AUAR area, the document must discuss <br />the compatibility of the plan with the various development scenarios studied, with <br />emphasis on any incompatible elements. <br />28. �mpact on Infrastructure a�d Public Services. This item should first of all s��nunarize <br />information on physical infrastructure presented under items (such 6, 17, 18 and 21). <br />Other maior infrastructure or oublic services not covered under other items should be <br />discussed as well — this includes major social services such as schools, police, fire, etc. <br />The RGU must be careful to include project-associated infrastructure as an explicit part <br />of the AUAR review if it is to exempt from project-specific review in the future. <br />: <br />