My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0620_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0620_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:51:49 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:34:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
29. Cumulative Impacts. This item does not require a response for an AUAR with respect <br />to cumulative impacts of potential developments within the AUAR boundaries, since the <br />entire AUAR process is intended to deal with cumulative impacts from related <br />developments within the AUAR area; it is presumed that the responses to all items on the <br />EAW form encompass the impacts from all anticipated developments within the AUAR <br />area. However, the questions of this item should be answered with respect to the <br />cumulative impacts of development within the AUAR boundaries combinedwith past, <br />present, and reasonably foreseeable futureprojects outside of the AUAR area, where such <br />cumulative impacts may he potentially significant. (As stated on the EAW form, these <br />cumulative impact descriptions may be provided as part of the responses to other <br />appropriate EAW items, or in response to this item). <br />30. Other Potential Environmental Impacts. If applicable, this item should be answered as <br />requested by the EAW form. <br />31. Summary of Issues. The RGU may answer this question as asked by the form, or instead <br />may choose to provide an Executive Summaryto the document that basically covers the <br />same information. Either way, the major emphasis should be on: potentially significant <br />impacts, the differences in impacts between major development scenarios, and the <br />proposed mitigation. <br />32. Certif'ication by the RGU. In an AUAR document, no certifications as listed at the end <br />of the EAW form are necessary. (The RGU is legally responsiblefor the accuracy and <br />completeness of the document and for properly distributing it nonetheless.) <br />Mitigation Plan. The final AUAR document must include an explicit mitigationplan. At the <br />RGU's option, a draft plan may be included in the draft AUAR document; of course, whether or <br />not there is a separate item for a draft mitigation plan, proposed mitigation must be addressed <br />through the document. <br />It must be understood that the mitigation plan in the final document takes on the nature of a <br />commitment by the RGU to prevent potentially significant impacts from occurring from specific <br />projects. It is more than just a list of ways to reduce impacts—it must include informationabout <br />how the mitigationwill he applied and assurance that it will. Otherwise, the AUAR may not be <br />adequate andlor specific projects may lose their exemption from the individual review. The <br />RG�'s final action on the AUAR must specifically adopt the mitigation plan; therefore, the plan <br />has a"political" as well as a technical dimension. <br />Response to Comments on the Draft AUAR Document. The final AUAR document must <br />include a section specifically responding to each timely and substantive comment on the draft <br />that indicates the way in which the comment has been addressed. Similar comments may be <br />combined for purposes of responding. <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.