Laserfiche WebLink
LivingWages & Communities: Smarter Economic Development, LowerT�an Expected Costs <br />Table 4: Impact of LivingWage Laws on City Business Subsidy Programs, �00 I <br />Number of PYOJOCtS with Numberof Pro�ects <br />Locality 7'� of Projects Living Wage �;OriC�1t10riS Cancelled Because of <br />EachYear LivingWage Law <br />Duluth, M I Health Care,Techno€ogy 2 0 <br />Los?�rgcles. C�t N xc� Usc 3 {J <br />Mmr�np��la. F?N T�d�nalq�r �J fl <br />�kland, �A Mi�ed usc I � <br />3rn fnmr,�c, Tx T�hr�p1� Fi�rtG� � 0 <br />Manu�a�.���n� <br />San �rtosaa��4 `iixe� u�e ' I <br />Taleda OH r1d4'FLrOI r�s 0 <br />�31Tl+1� �� �rldL��s�. �3IN�i::4� �� #�� � <br />�'ps��nki�Ml I�des�sal E Q <br />�'ps��i�siT4wr•s��ia. `il Tac�n•o�agX. �i�Kvst���' S � � <br />Minneapolis, which has had a living wage requirement in effect since 1998, has seen no drop in <br />applications for business subsidies under its economic development program, and no complaints <br />from businesses since it implemented its living wage policy?' <br />• In San Antonio, which last year expanded its living wage policy to incorporate a base living wage <br />standard for all of business subsidy recipients' employees, the Economic Development <br />Department successfully recruited a grocery firm to locate its meat distribution plant in the city, <br />which is expected to create 40 new jobs at or above the $8.75 livingwage rate." In negotiating <br />the project, the company raised no objections to the wage -�yuir� a�t �,�. ' <br />• In Toledo, which experienced a drop in applications for subsidized loans for machinery and <br />equipment in 2001, the economic development administrator attributed the decrease to current <br />economic uncertainties —not the obligation to pay a living wage." <br />• Similarly, administrators in Los Angeles and Oaldand attributed any reduction in retail develop- <br />ment to the recent decline in tourism, rather than the living wage requirement. <br />Limited Impact Even on Business Subsidy Programs That Target Employers in Lower Paying <br />Sectors Such as Retail <br />Generally, few cities use economic development funds to subsidize the creation or retention of jobs in <br />low-wage sectors such as retaiL Many localities da not see providing business subsidies to retailers, <br />whose employees generally earn at or just above the minimum wage, as the best use of scarce economic <br />development dollars. As Karen �.ovejoy Roe, Supervisor of Ypsilanti Township, explained, "the <br />Township Board ... feels that if you are going to cut a person's taxes to promote economic develop- <br />ment, it's only worthwhile if the employees are malcing a decent living standard."42 As a result, few of <br />the localities provided subsidies directly to retail establishments. <br />However, more communities do choose to subsidize mixed-use development projects, which may <br />include some combination of office, housing, and retail space. The economic development depart- <br />ments in San Francisco, Oalcland, and Los Angeles have mandated that developers of mixed-use devel- <br />opment projects malce efforts to ensure that their retail tenants pay the living wage rate. In these <br />instances, local governments have had mixed success with retail establishments. <br />*� <br />