2006_0828_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

�.� The building materials pallet includes EIFS, metal panels, spandrel glass, and storefront glazing (windows and doors) which are permitted under §� 010.0 � of the City Code. Painting of exterior building walls is permissible only if previously painted. Staff supports the building elevation design and materials selection, but would like to work with applicant on the possibilities of incorporating other building materials instead of paint. �. r Structure height is proposed at 22 feet for the single story portions of the structure and 30 feet for the entry icon. The City Code allows up to three stories in the B-3 District. Staff is unclear about the location of new mechanical units. It is assumed that these units will be rooftop, for which they must be 100% screened from view from the property line. Strategically locating rooftop units and proper parapet wall height can eliminate any additional screening needs. Staff will not support a separate rooftop screen around mechanical units. Additionally any ground units, emergency generator, or electrical transformer must be appropriately screened from view utilizing either a screen fence, landscaping, or a combination thereof. �. #� Grading, drainage and utility plans have not been submitted for consideration. All sanitary sewer and watermain must be properly sized. The drainage plan must be reviewed and approved by the Rice Creek Watershed as well as the Roseville City Engineer. �.� Because this is an addition to a pre-existing non-conforming site development that does not require variances to be supported, the DRC has been conscious of the limitations in improving the site and has concluded that the site lighting could remain non-conforming. �, ��i � 1013.01 requires the City to consider the following criteria when reviewing a Conditional Use Permit: a. Impact on traffic b. Impacts on parks, streets and other public facilities c. Compatibilityof the site plan, internal circulation, landscaping and structure with contiguous properties d. Impact of the use on market value of contiguous properties e. Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare f. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan � 1�I The City Planner has reviewed the proposed z-edevelapmenilimp;rovement (and discussed them with the Public Works Department and Development Review Committee) to the property at 2805 Highway 35 and concluded the proposal meets the above listed criteria. Specifically, the construction of a showroom addition is permitted in a B-3 District by issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed addition will not create additional traffic or the need for additional public facilities. With proper exterior building treatment, drainage, and landscaping, the building will not have an impact on surrounding property or values. There appears to be no impact on general health, safety, and public PF3779_RCA_082846.dnc Page 4 of7