Laserfiche WebLink
S.0 PROJECT IMPACTS <br />�_ 1 Traffic generation (Source: Institute of Traffic Engineers — Traffic Generation Manual) is <br />estimated to be from 7 to 11 vehicle trips per dwellingunit per day, or a total of 21 to 33 <br />additional trips entering or leaving the site during a given 24-hour period. While Acorn <br />Road is narrower than most other streets in Roseville, the City Engineer has affirmed that <br />Acorn Road is able to handle the same volume of vehicle traffic as any other two-lane <br />road. The additional vehicle trips will not cause the total volume of vehicle traffic to <br />exceed the current capacity Acorn Road. <br />5, � The City has adequate sanitary sewer, storm water, and water mains in place to support <br />the development project. Prior to Final Development �'Ian approval, the Public Works <br />Department and the Rice Creek Watershed must review and approve all of these detailed <br />plans. <br />�.� STAFF COMMENTS AND FINDINGS: <br />�r. ! Section 1103.021 C(Minimum Roadway Standards) of the City Code indicates that no <br />cul-de-sac is required in the absence of a looped road system if a street is less than 200 <br />feet in length; because the proposed private road is only about 175 feet long, the City <br />does not require the provision of a cul-de-sac. <br />b,� Section 110�,02A (SubdivisionDesign Standards) of the City Code requires that <br />publicly-dedicated cul-de-sacs have a minimum right-of-way (ROW) radius of 60 feet; <br />this development will require a PUD because the radius of the private easement for the <br />proposed cul-de-sac is only 42 feet. <br />fi_3 Section 1103.02A further requires that a publicly-dedicated local street have a minimum <br />ROW of 60 feet; again, this development requires a PLTU because the private easement of <br />the proposed street is only 51 feet. <br />6, � Emergency vehicles will still be able to utilize the proposed private road and cul-de-sac, <br />but the City will not assume ownership of the infrastructure because of its substandard <br />dimensions. <br />�,, 5 Rezoning the property to PUD to accommodate the proposed development is consistent <br />with the Comprehensive Plan, which guides this area for low-density residential uses, <br />because the proposed development will remain under the density threshold of 4-units-per- <br />acre. <br />�.�a The residential building setbacks are acceptable as proposed. The northern property line <br />of Lots 3 and 4 and the southern property line of Lots 1 and 2 abut the interior side yards <br />of the adj acent properties; planning staff would, therefore, support 10-foot principal <br />structure setbacks from each of these property lines so as not to impose a higher standard <br />on the proposed new lots than is required of the existing lots. Since the western property <br />line of Lots 2 and 3 abut the rear yard of the properties to the west, it appropriate to <br />maintain the 30-foot setback from those property lines as proposed. <br />�. � The proposed preliminary plat indicates 10-foot drainage/utility easements centered on <br />P�'3766�RCA�GeneralCancept{092546} I.doc Page 4 of 7 <br />