2006_0925_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

RESIDENTIAL LOTS �. S The proposed single family home site setbacks appear to be as follows: 30-foot setbacks from the front property lines along the new cul-de-sac street, 5-foot side yard setbacks from the proposed internal property lines and the western property line adjacent to the Reservoir Woods park, 30-foot setbacks adjacent to the rear yards of the existing lots to the south of the subject property, and a 30-foot setback adjacent to WoodruffAvenue. �. �' Each proposed building envelope will be of sufficientwidth and depth to accommodate a home, attached garage, and other living area options such as a porch, deck, andlor patio. �. ] ta Driveways will directly access the proposed cul-de-sac sheet. They will be a maximum of 26 feet in width in the right-of-way and at the property line, and will include enough depth (i.e., at least 25 feet) to afford ample room for the off-street parl�ing of vehicles. �. k � The applicants intend to build custom homes on the lots, rather than building on speculation. OTHER IMPROVEMENTS �k . 9 � Storm water management in the form of ponds or infiltration areas, or a combination thereof, will be incorporated into the project as necessary and be illustratedin the FINAL PLAT. VACATIONS �. �� The applicant has requested that the City support the VACATION of an existing sanitary sewer easement that runs through the northern portion of six of the eight existing lots; the existing sanitary sewer would be subsequently relocated and a new easement would then be established. The applicant has also requested the VACATION of the existing, undeveloped right-of-way for Chandler Avenue adjacent to Lot 14, Block 4, Rolling Green. -G. L� When reviewing requests for vacating public easements or public rights-of-way, the Public WorkslEngineering Department determines whether the request will, immediately or in the future, negatively impact the health, safety, or general welfare of the citizens of the RasevilIe. ,� .]� In the case of a sanitary sewer easement vacation there needs to be a determination of whether an easement is necessary, whether it mal{es prudent sense to relocate the easement, whether the percentage of gradient of the pipe would be compromised, and whether an appropriate new easement can be created. �_ 1+� In the case of a street vacation there needs to be a determination of whether said street right-of-way is or will be necessary to facilitate the distribution of traffic in a neighborhood, whether existing public utilities lie underneath the right-of-way, and how best to retain an easement protecting the public interest. �. ]� If the City does determine that a given easement or right-of-waywill not be used for its dedicated purpose, it is obligated to return the affected land area to the property owner upon request and review. �P3� ��_��'�_�,ns�raa�'a}�4�+�4+�7��I�� I.415k: Page 3 of 7