Laserfiche WebLink
along a steep slope down to Dale Street from the property line. The existing <br />property has no garage and has lot coverage of approximately 1450 sq. ft. (or <br />15%) and could have up to 2,826 sq. ft. of lot coverage. Parcel "B" could have lot <br />coverage up to 2,754 sq. fi. The proposed tuck-underhouse is shown as 1,600 sq. <br />ft., leaving 1,154 sq. ft. for driveway and other site improvements �-- a new <br />driveway on Parcel "A" could range from 600 to 1,000 sq. ft. The newly created <br />parcel will have a front and yard setback of up to 50 feet, a side yard setback of 10 <br />feet, and an impervious coverage of 30% or 2,754 sq. ft. <br />5.2 Other lots/parcels in the neighborhood exist that are similar to that which Mr. <br />Beauclaire is proposing. Specifically, in May 1983 the City approved a lot <br />division at 1748 Alta Vista, creating the lot at 1747 Dale Street (P� 1425) and in <br />July of 1984 the City approved a lot division at 1766 Alta Vista, creating the lot at <br />1765 Dale Street {PF 15 � 3). P�'636 of 1971 created the four lots at 1800, 1804 <br />and 1808 Alta Vista and 1781 Dale Street, and �'��292 of 1981 createdthe 6 lots <br />at 1812, 1816, 1820, 1822 Alta Vista and the 2 vacant lots adjacent to Dale Street. <br />It is worth noting that none of the lot divisions received variances from width, <br />depth and/or lot area requirements of the Roseville City Code. Further, this area <br />of Roseville does not have a standard or universal lot or sanitary sewer design, <br />due to curved roadways, change in topography from Alta Vista declining to Dale, <br />and the decades in which the land was subdivided. <br />53 Section 11.0404 E states: Three Parcel Minor Subdivision: When a subdivision <br />creates a total of three (3) or less parcels, situated in an area where public utilities <br />and street rights of way to serve the proposed parcels already exist i�. accordance <br />with City codes, and no �urthcr utility or street extensions are necessary, and the <br />new parcels meet or exceed the size requirements of the zoning code, the <br />applicant may apply for a minor subdivision approvaL In this case neither parcel <br />meets all requirements of the City Code. A series of variances are necessary <br />before a decision on the Minor Subdivision can be made. <br />5.4 Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements)establishes the <br />minimum lot standards for residential parcels, which includes: an 85 foot <br />minimum width along a public right-of-way; a 110 foot minimum depth; and <br />11,000 minimum square feet. <br />5.5 In Section 1013 the Code states ..... Where there are practical difficulties or <br />unusual hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the <br />provisions of this code, the Variance Board shall have the power, in a specific <br />case and after notice and public hearings, to vary any such provision in <br />harmony with the general purpose and intent thereof and may impose such <br />additional conditions as it considers necessary so that the public health, <br />safety, and general welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. <br />5.6 State Statute 462357, subd. 6(2) provides authority for the city to "hear <br />PF3626mmRCA_0425�5 Page 3 of 6 <br />