Laserfiche WebLink
requests for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in <br />instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship <br />because of circumstances unique to the individual property under <br />consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is demonstrated that <br />such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />"Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance <br />means the property in question cannot be gut to a reasonable use if used <br />under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner <br />is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, <br />and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the <br />locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue <br />hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the <br />ordinance....The board or governing body as the case may be may impose <br />conditions in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to protect" <br />5.7 Theproperty in question cannot be put to a reasonable use �, f'u�ec�' under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls: The Official Controls of the City <br />prescribe that all single family residential parcels be a minimum of 85 feet in <br />width, 110 feet in depth and 11,000 sq. ft, in size. Mr. Beauc�a�re has a pre- <br />existing lot that is 321 feet deep on the north and 299 feet deep on the south. Mr. <br />Beauclaire proposes to create two similarly sized and shaped parcels, although <br />neither wi�� meet the width and lot size requirements. The adjacent lot to the <br />north on Dale Street is a creative shape averaging over 58 or more feet of width, <br />130 feet of depth and over 7,800 sq. ft. in size. There are two more parcels in the <br />general vicinitythat are similar to the proposal by Mr. Beauclaire. Though the <br />property in its current state can be put to a reasonable use under the Official <br />Controls, the property is under utilized as was the case of the above identified <br />addressed properties. The Community Development Staff has determined that <br />the vacant property can be put to a reasonable and practical use under the <br />official controls if the appropriate variances are granted. <br />5.8 Theplight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to theproperty not <br />created by the landowner: The Beauclaire situation is unique. In 1964, the <br />County had previously graded this lot and provided (at that time) a driveway <br />access to the lot from Dale Street. Most double frontage parcels in Roseville abut <br />the rear yard adjacent to collector or arterial roadways such as County Road B or <br />C. In the past five years, the City has approved land division for a few double <br />frontage parcels (such as Burke Street), but none that included variances. <br />However, previous substandard "lot splits" were supported by the City that did not <br />include variances to minimum lot standards prescribed }�k� the Code. The <br />Community Development Staff has detera�i�.�d that ��e plight of the <br />landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the <br />landowner. <br />PF3626, RCA�4425�5 Page 4 of 6 <br />