My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0523_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0523_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 3:47:52 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:02:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — OS/16/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 16 <br />Councilmembers that specificallyrelated to the use of purchasing <br />cards and the check register presented for periodic Council <br />review and approval. <br />Councilmember Kough expressed his continued dissatisfaction <br />with the current list of checks; requesting additional detail <br />identifying items purchased and for what purpose. <br />Councilmember Kough assured staff and Councilmembers that <br />he was not questioning individual honesty, but using a sample of <br />the weekly report used by the City of Brooklyn Park, was <br />requesting additional information prior to approving purchases. <br />Mayor Klausing sought to clarify the context of specific policy <br />issue or objective Councilmember Kough was attempting to <br />achieve. <br />Discussion included, with City Attorney clarification, City <br />Manager authority related to claims and payment of such under <br />State Statute 412.271; internal accounting and control procedures <br />in place; and the comfort level of the City Council in its review <br />authority. <br />Further discussion included receipt of the Check Register <br />allowing time for Councilmembers to individually review and <br />contact staff with their questions, rather than during a Council <br />meeting; format of current report used by staff to detail the <br />Check Register and payment transactions; and further <br />clarificationrequested by Councilmember Kough. <br />Mr. Miller volunteered to provide additional detail (i.�., attaching <br />purchasing card statements) if so requested by the City Council. <br />After further discussion, Mr. Miller offered to expand the Check <br />Register by an additional column to provide the same <br />information tracked internally and to provide greater detail as to <br />the transaction. <br />Further discussion included restrictions and internal controls on <br />purchasing cards used by staff; <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that in reviewing overall policies <br />and internal controls, receipt of a weekly Check Register would <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.