2005_0711_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

house services. The cast for this can vary between $1500- $5000/ home. Also, there is an additional $2 charge for monthly biIls when a home is served by an underground service. Finally, it would still be necessary to relocate and provide electricity ta those power poles that hava streetli�;hts an them Private Driveways: We have mei separately with the owners of 349, 345, 337, 333, 329, 317 and 313. The�e praperties access S. 4wasso Blvd via a private shared driveway. We have provided to therr� infarmation about paving their driveway as well as proposed a desigr� ta address their storm wat�r drainage concerns. C�nsistent with past practice, the private driveway reconstruc#ion wauld lae paid for by the property owners. The storm drainage improvemeni could be paid for by storrr� water infrastructure funds. This wark cat� be connpleted in conjunction witl� the project or separate. The City Attorne�;is of t�e opinion that properties alang the private darive, while not directly abutting the street, do benefit from the proposed improver�ent. As such we have put together assessment options that are consistent wi�h the assessments we levied in 2004 for the private drive off of W. Victoria Street Frontage Road. These options are: • Option 1: Use faotage of 349 S. Owasso, the first lot that aecesses the private driveway and apply to all lots on private driveway • Optian 2: Use front faota�e of each individual property. • Option 3: Divide fiootage equally between parcels (6aQ feet total/ 7 total lots) • Option 4: No assessment for S. Owasso reconstruction for lots not abutting public ri�ht- of- way. (both 349 and 34S abut ihe right- of- way) • Option 5: Divide the abutting footage between t�e $ parcels. (81.93'/ S) Staff rec�mmends Option 1. It is consistent wi�:h the Council approved assessments levied �or � the W. Victoria k�rontage Road in 2004. We have attached a drawing showing the options. Staff asks that if Council considers option 4, tha# they also take another look at the other non- � abutting properties on this road to ensure we are treating all properties alike. The homes at 450, 472, and 562 are all so�zth af the Raiiroad tracks, tk�eir paroperties do not directly abut S. Owasso Blvd. However, the road is the �rirnary access to their homes. We have calculated these hoz�eowner's assessments consistent with the City's assessment policy. Storm water: Whenever possible, the Ci�y attempts #o eliminate direct runo�f to lakes by diverting stormwater through pretreatment systems. Lake Owasso water quality was discussed as being a primary concern for the neighborhaod as tivell as City staff and Grass Lake WMO. Between Rice Street and Western I�venue: we propose to construct starm water treatment ponds within Ladyslipper Park to accammodate the 160 acre subwatershed that currently drains directly into Lake Owasso. This subwatershed is the largest remaining untreated dir�ct diachar�e af stormwater into Lake 4wasso. GLWM4 as well as the City ni Roseville, have included the reduction o� sediment and phosphorus loading in Lake Owassa as a prfnaary goai in th�ir