My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0808_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0808_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 9:08:04 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:03:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — 07/11/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 16 <br />neighborhood. <br />Discussion included location of sidewalks related to guardrails <br />and towers; costs and potential easement permission from the <br />railroad for fencing; futuxe use of the limited-use rail system for <br />light rail transit line purposes and implications to current city <br />construction and needs; <br />Tom Stratton, 3000 Sandy Hook Drive <br />Mr. Stratton spoke against the fence. <br />Bruce Mosimann, 393 S Qwassa Boulevard <br />Mr. Mosimann spoke to "stray electricity" along the areas of the <br />towers. <br />David Kacmarynski, 225 S Qwasso Boulevard <br />Mr. Kacmarynski spoke as a proponent of the proposed project, <br />specifically to reduce speed. Mr. Kacmarynski opined that many <br />people had stopped walking along the road due to speed and <br />safety concerns. Mr. Kacmarynski opined that the project would <br />reduce speeds and improve public safety; enhance the park and <br />surrounding area; and cure problems with phosphorus going into <br />the lake; and encouraged the City Council to proceed with the <br />project. <br />Two Bench Handouts were included in the Public Hearing <br />materials related to this matter: an e-mail from Dick Lambert, <br />and an e-mail from Roger Toogoad. <br />Further Council discussion included the additional cost for the <br />park realignment. Council consensus appeared to be that the <br />�200,000 cost for realignment should be a City-borne cost, <br />and not assessable to the residents. <br />Councilmember Schroeder spoke in support of the City bearing <br />the cost of the park realignment; and encouraged staff to fuz�k�e�' <br />review location of the sidewalk behind the power poles, not only <br />to make the walkway more inviting and interesting, but to allow <br />more roadway width. Councilmember Schroeder noted that the <br />railroad track was and interim issue and not a long-term viability, <br />and while it would remain some type of transportation corridor, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.