2005_0822_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Memo Via Email To: Dennis Welsch, Roseville Community Development Director From: Steve Dorff, Meritex Enterprises Re: Merite� IUP 2 year Truck Parking Proposal and SafetylSecurity Plan Date: Augustl2, 2005 On Thursday August '��' Steve �orFf of Mentex, John Loftus and Rick Mathwig of Roseville, Tom Quinlan and Chris Peterson from Dedicated Logistics met at the site of the proposed semi-trailer parking lot. Tom presented a response to the issues raised by John and Rick. Tom's response and the ensuing discussion are recapped below: 1. As to driving lanes; An 8 trailer demonstration was provided. Rick and John were satisfied with the arrangement. 2. All parties felt that a fence was not beneficial in this instance. As a matter of fact, the fence would be harmful by causing a delay in emergency response and operating the gates may affect traffic on Walnut. Also due to the fact that Meritex has a 24 hour guard and Dedicated Logistics would be doing yard checks and periodic trailer repositioning, festering problems would be noticed before they became a big problem. Dedicated has parked these trailers in the Twin Lakes area for over five years without serious problems. 3. In response to the concern over items stored in trailers, Tom reported that less than 50 trailers would contain any items at all. Of the 50 most would be office and shop materials from Dedicated Logistics operations. No hazardous materials would be stored here. 4. Dedicated Logistics will have a written inventory of the contents of any trailer. 5. Access would not be an issue if there were no fence 6. The 24 hour contact would be Chris Peterson 651-324-4435; Tom Quinlan 612-810. 4288; Tom Wintz 612-865-3103; Meri#ex security 651-855-9655. 7. All trailers will have current licenses and be roadworthy for Dedicated Logistics customers. 8. No hazardous materials will be stored here. 9. Due to the configuration of the lot John and Rick felt that additional lights would cause more shadows and therefore not help in searching the area if that was needed. — We believe these responses fulfill the safety concerns of Roseville's authorities. And as a — result of the meeting, all parties feel that a fence will not serve a useful purpose. We request — that the interim use permit be amended to eliminate the fencing requirement for the two year period. Thanks for your assistance. Please advise if further information is required.