2005_0912_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

�. E� The second vacation, an 8 inch sanitary sewer line within a 20 foot sanitary sewer ��7�1, lies diagonally across Lot 1 from Fulham Street to the western property line. The sanitary sewer line, the easement, and the lift station located within the Fulham Street right-of-way will be relocated to the east along the northern boundary of the condominium parcel and new easements provided, at the developer's expense. The existing easement will be vacated. �.�? PROJECT IMPACTS: �,1 Traffic generation for the entire project (Source: Institute of 1'ra�iic Engineers — Traffic Generation Manual) is estimated to be from 7 to 11 vehicle trips per housing unit or a total of 252 to 396 trips which will enter or leave this residential development from Fulham Street to Roselawn Avenue during a given 24 hour day. Staff estimates the 6 single family units may generate between 40 and 75 vehicle trips of the total. Based on ITE calculations, the peak PM hour will range from 14 to 20 vehicle trips. This includes vehicles such as the mail truck and garbage pick-up. Roselawn Avenue with 2,200 ADT (2000) trips per day in this location is not at capacity for an "A" Minor Arterial street and can easily absorb the added trips (a "trip" is defined as one vehicle entering or leaving a lot). It is estimated that Roselaw� Avenue will have 3,100 ADT by 2010 and 4,200 ADT by 2020. �.:` The City Code requires off-street parking to consist of two spaces for each dwelling unit, of which 1 space will be within a garage. In the case of the 6 United Properties sin l�e famil,y homes proposal, each sin,gle faxnilV home will have 2 a�ra e�spaces and 2 drivewa,y spaces available. �.�? The placement of inechanical equipment can create visual and noise issues. It is assumed that heating, cooling, and ventilating equipment and air conditioning units will be located on the ground and must be placed on the north side of each home and screened from view. �.� The City has adequate sanitary sewer, storm water, and water mains in place to support the development project. The Public Works Department and the Rice Creek Watershed, prior to issuance of any city permits, must review and approve all of these detailed plans. f�� STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND CONDITIONS: �ti_ I On October 8,2003, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the "GENERAL CONCEPT P LAN proposal and voted (5-1) and recommended approval the proposal from United Properties. At that time the proposal still included 6 dwelling units, but the design was for town homes in 2 structures of 3 units each. f�.? On October 20, the Roseville City Council reviewed the "GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN and approved the proposal with conditions. PF3670_RCA_091245.doc Page 5 of 7