Laserfiche WebLink
5.� Additional parking will be constructed in the rear (west side) of the lot to provide the <br />required on-site spaces for the uses on the site, specifically that of Dunn Bros. and Wine <br />Time. Existing parking on the site numbers 32 stalls. The proposed plan would provide <br />an additional 50 spaces. However, the current/praposed use of the site may not warrant a <br />large parking lot. Under the worst case scenario (retail/office use at 85% structure size) <br />required parking would be a maximum of 77 spaces versus the proposal to create 82 total <br />spaces. (Staff estimates that the 18,000 s.f. building is divided approximately 60% retail, <br />15% office, and 25% storage/warehouse.} <br />�.� The proposed drive lane would loop through the new rear parking lot, around the south <br />side of the structure and to the southerly access back to Fairview Avenue. <br />�.� The applicant (Dunn Bros.) indicates that theyplan to operate a 2,000 sq. ft. coffee shop <br />with hours of operation from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. Further, they estimate (based on similar <br />store desi�;nluse) 35 to 40 vehicles utilizing the drive-through during the a.m. peak hour <br />of 7:3d to $:34 a.m. with an estimated usage of 10 to 20 vehicles per hour during the <br />balance of the weekday (see attached). <br />�.? Staff has also reviewed existing site conditions and the proposed plan improvements and <br />concludes the following: <br />1. A pedestrian separation from the building and the drive-through lane is necessary <br />to provide customers exterior access to the wine store and the Dunn Bros. The <br />owner, Love From Minnesota and Bunn Bros. propose a striped and bollard (post) <br />system to separate cars from pedestrians. <br />2. The drive-through lane must be designed in a manner to prevent (as best as <br />possible) vehicles from u-turning into the northern parking lot. Staff has <br />discussed this matter with the applicant and adjacent property owner and will <br />work with both to create an appropriate design. Both owners have agreed to a set <br />of private actions that will resolve these turning movement conflicts. <br />3. All existing storage containers at the rear of the property must be removed from <br />the premises (currently a direct violation of the City Code — outdoor storage is not <br />allowed in B-3 zone). Staff has discussed this situation with Mr. Steve Chinander <br />(Love From Minnesota) and will continue to work with him on viable temporary <br />options during the remodeling proj ect — however, after complete all detached <br />storage units will be required to be removed from the premises. <br />4. The proposed trash enclosure near the rear of the property must be designed <br />appropriately to handle trash and recyclables and must be roofed with a gate. <br />5. Additional landscaping in the rear parking lot (5% of parking surface area) must <br />be provided to meet the requirements of Section 1010.05 of the Roseville City <br />Code. <br />�, � The overall design of the exterior of the structure will be enhanced with two new entry <br />addition and signage areas. Cultured stone, stucco and other permitted exterior finishes <br />are being considered to upgrade the existing structure. Specific to the CUP request, the <br />PF3672_RCA_092605 - Page 3 of 7 <br />