2005_0926_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

E. Access doorways must be planned that will not empty directly into the path of the drive-through. This can be done with a new striped walkway and protective bollards along the building wall, west of the drive-through window. F. Prior to a building permit being issued for redevelopment of the site, the applicant must post a landscape bond, letter of credit, or other security acceptable to the City, in an amount equal to 150% of the cost of landscaping, trash enclosures, and site paving and curbing installation. The specific amount of this security shall be determined by the Community Development Director following completion of all site construction plans. G. T�.e conditional use permit will expire within six months of the date of City Council approval if a building permit is not obtained for the approved development (Section 1013.03 of the City Code). H. Minor variations from the approved plans may be approved by the City's Development Review Committee, under the direction of the Community Development Director; however, any substantial departures from the approved plans will require an amendment to the conditional use permit. 8.0 PLANNING COMMISSIONACTION: 8.1 On September 7,2005, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Love From Minnesota request. At the hearing no citizens were present to address the Goz��.��sszon. However, Commissioners did have questions and comments of staff and the ownerlapplicant regarding the proposed drive-through window. 8.2 Specifically, Commissioner Bakeman asked if the wine store door would open onto (near) the drive lane and how would pedestrians be protected (door currently located on north side of structure as is the access to the Dunn Bros. facility — pedestrians safety would occur through a protected walkway, curb, or other device). 8.3 Commissioner poherty expressed concern over the location of E�e northwestern most on- site parking stall and its proximity to (potential conflict with) the drive-through lane. Staff indicated that they would work with the applicants on the potential elimination of said stall — if detem�i��ed to be in conflict with by-pass lane. 8.4 Chair Traynor asked for clarification on site access (vehicles would enter on north and travel a one-way around building and exit at south access to Fairview Avenue) 8.5 Commissioner Boerigter asked what constitutes the appropriate drive-through count for this facility (5 vehicles) and whether that number or length within the parking was adequate (yes). PF3672_RCA_092505 - Page 6 of 7