2005_0926_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

] accepts the current proposed layout because of the excess parking in the rear of the � building. Will vehicles be able to negotiate the parking lot to enter the stacking lane? i Thomas Paschke explained the spacing within the drive lanes. � 5 Chair Taraynor asked for an explanation of how to enter the rear lot from the north entry �i in a one-way traffic pattern. 1� Member Boerigter asked how certain the stacking "count" is for the drive through lane. {� He expressed concern that the spaces may not be adequate. Thomas Paschke explained Lil that 6 vehicles at a time is s similar stacking at the Library. Will there be back up on to I I Fairview? DJR Architects estimated the speed and turnover of the "beverage only" Lr customers and projected a need for 5 to 6 stacking spaces. There is also an escape lane to I� the rear of the building. Member Wozniak asked how the bollards will work at the I� property line — is there enough space for the two lanes? IS 1 fa Member �akeman asked if the front parking spaces will have cars that must exit around ]� the building — with entry only from the north driveway, exiting from the south driveway. ]� Could the parking stalls be angled and striped to encourage one way traffic flow (yes)? 1'� 2i:� Member Wozniak expressed concern with the number of drives along Fairview. Could i] the project help reduce left hand turns to reduce traffic congestions and the number of �? lanes? Could the exits state "No Left Turns"? (The County has not reduced access points � � along Fairview.) �� �� � [� 2� �8 �4 i�r 3� �.� �} 3� 3� �� 3r 3� �{� �� �1 �? �1� �� �5 ��a Thomas Paschke explained the in�oz�aal shared access agreement between the adjoining property owners along the north property line. Member Boerigter supported the project with striping, signage, and traffic flow to a capacity of 5 to 6 vehicle spaces for stacking. Member Bakeman agreed. The diagonal striping and boilards will help. She supported the protective pedestrian walkway. Member Pust suggested reduced parking in front, and more parking in the rear. Member Doherty supported the parking in the rear but was concerned about the emergency or passing lane adjacent to the drive though. There were no comments from the public. Chair Traynor closed the hearing. Motion: Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member poherty, to recommend approval of a conditional use permit allowing the installation and operation of a dri�ae- thru window at Scott Roberts Trust (owner) and Love from Minnesota (main tenant) for Dunn Bros. Coffee (sublease from Love from Minnesota) 2465 Fairview Avenue, based on the comments and findings outlined in Section 6 and conditions outlined in Section 7 (a through g) of the project report dated September 7,2005. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Motion carried.