My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_1114_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_1114_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:18:20 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:10:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item Description: <br />��� � _ <br />��,.,•- - — � _ � �_ � <br />Request for Council Action <br />Consider Firefighter Pay <br />L BACKGROUND <br />Date: 11/14/OS <br />Item: 10. <br />Firefighter Pay <br />November 14,2005 <br />On October 24�', Council authorized a new pay plan for non-unionized city employees other <br />than firefighters effective January 1,2006. <br />We have made two previous presentations during budget sessions about firefighter pay. <br />I�. ADDRESSING COUNCILMEMBER CONCERNS <br />In previous budget sessions we have heard support for an increase in firefighter pay as well as <br />some concerns. This memo addresses the concerns we have heard. ff there are concerns that <br />have not been voiced yet, we would like a chance to respond to those. <br />The major concern we heard was that the pay schedule for firefighters must be accommodated <br />within a 5% levy increase. We can do that with a tweak to the firefighter pay plan we <br />presented previously. <br />Previously, we talked about a pay range varying from $14/hr. to $1$/hr. (There was also a <br />resting/slee�zng rate of $�.0/hr.} To keep the firefighter pay plan within a 5%tax levy, we <br />would have to do one of two things: Either (1) Reduce the pay range $2 per hour throughout <br />each level of the pay range so that the resulting range is from $12/hr. to $16/hr. (still with a <br />$��}/hx. �es�i�g/sle�ping rate); OR (2) Reconsider the Training Manager position that allows us <br />to achieve savings by doing training on duty rather than by calling-back firefighters for special <br />training sessions. <br />Since the Council previously rejected the Training Manager position, I'm hoping the Council <br />will either approve a new firefighter pay plan with a$2/hr reduction that brings us within a <br />5%levy, or the Council will reconsider the Training Manager position and authorize the $��-- <br />$18 pay range. <br />IiZ. REOUEST <br />A Council Motion (1) approving a new pay plan for firefighters effective January 1,2006, that <br />is graduated from $12/hr. to $16/hr. based on rank OR (2)approving the Training Manager <br />position and a graduated pay rate for firefighters of $��k/hr. to $18/hr. based on rank, effective <br />January 1,2006. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.