My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_1114_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_1114_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:18:20 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:10:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — �012410� <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 28 <br />implementing the optional plans was to put the incentive in the <br />right place and allow the consumer to learn the market and be in <br />charge of their healthcare. <br />Maschka moved, Kough seconded, approval of the 2006 <br />insurance program described in the Requests for Council Action <br />dated October 24, 2005 and October 17, 2005, and the respective <br />contracts and fund allocations; subject to review and approval by <br />the City Attorney. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Maschka; Kough; Schroeder and Klausing. <br />Nays: Ihlan. <br />Maschka moved, Klausing seconded, adoption of Resolution No. <br />10348 entitled, "Establishing a New Exempt Compensation Plan <br />and a Non-Exempt Compensation Plan." <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke to the linkage issue; and her support <br />of phasing in the compensation plan, if it fit within the 5% levy <br />increase package; and her opposition to linking the two from a <br />policy standpoint. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding merit pay; budget <br />discussions; phasing of the program; separate issue of the Fire <br />Department and proposed increases between $12 and $16 as <br />proposed by the most recent City Manager Budget Proposal <br />(identified as Option D); and use of the Stan.ta�. V data. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Ihlan; Maschka; Schroeder and Klausing. <br />Nays: Kough. <br />14. Consider Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate a <br />Contract for City Prosecutor and City Attorney Services <br />with Designated Law Firms <br />City Manager Beets reviewed the additional data requested by <br />Council related to retainers and costs; noting that all legal firms <br />had signed a waiver allowing the City Council to discuss the firm <br />by name. <br />Contract for City <br />Prosecutor and <br />City Attorney <br />Services <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.