Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville Human Rights Commission <br />Meeting Minutes -September 08, 2009 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />1 including meeting structure, should future meetings be televised, including public comment and <br />2 development of more effective meeting agendas as the HRC sought to reach out into the <br />3 community; and ensuring that the HRC achieve their goals. <br />4 <br />5 Some members referenced a work plan developed in 2003 and asked Ms. Curti to provide a copy <br />6 of that document. <br />7 <br />8 Discussion included how the facilitator could take the HRC Strategic Plan and assist in achieving <br />9 those efforts; value of a workshop exclusively for this discussion; how to develop an action plan <br />10 and measure goals through timelines and delegating responsibilities; and advantages in future <br />11 grant applications to show the proactive efforts of the HRC. <br />12 <br />13 Member Grefenberg expressed his interest in getting to know HRC members and their <br />14 philosophies and interests, rather than devoting time to effective meeting management, while <br />15 recognizing the need of an effective order for meeting business. <br />16 <br />17 Chair Singleton noted his rationale in suggesting a more simplistic alternative for meeting <br />18 management (i.e., Robert Rules) for the benefit of commissioners needing additional <br />19 information. <br />20 <br />21 Vice Chair Oftelie expressed interest, and lack of previous training, in meeting operating <br />22 procedures and rules. <br />23 <br />24 Member Jaeger moved, seconded by Member Yates, approval of Global Synergy Group, and Mr. <br />25 Richard Fursman as the facilitator for the workshop, using grant funds from the Minnesota <br />26 Department of Human Rights Bremer Foundation Grant, as recently awarded. <br />27 <br />28 Member Kennedy offered a friendly amendment that the HRC expected that the session would <br />29 result in a viable HRC work plan as a product. The makers of the motion accepted the friendly <br />30 amendment, and included it as a part of their motion. <br />31 <br />32 Member Grefenberg spoke in support of the motion, as amended; and expressed his interest in <br />33 the facilitator seeking involvement and comment from each commissioner prior to the workshop. <br />34 <br />35 Motion carried: all Ayes: 7/0. <br />36 <br />37 V. Consider whether to apply for another MN Department of Human Rights Grant - <br />38 Deadline September 30, 2009. <br />39 Ms. Curti sought interest of members in making application to the Minnesota Department of <br />40 Human Rights for the next grant cycle, with a deadline of September 30, 2009, for application to <br />41 funds up to $1,500 to develop a local commission's capacity building project or implement a <br />42 civic engagement project; anticipating that funding would be used for the third annual, 2010 <br />43 community forum. Ms. Curti said she talked with MN HRC Grant Coordinator, Mario <br />44 Hernandez, and he felt that the HRC would be eligible for funding, given his familiarity with last <br />45 year's forum. <br />