My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1012
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2009 12:44:17 PM
Creation date
11/4/2009 12:44:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/12/2009
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, October 12, 2009 <br />Page 18 <br />ment, they could better assess a situation and provide that additional information <br />to additional personnel <br />Acting Chief O'Neill concurred; noting that many calls came into dispatch as one <br />thing, and turned out to be an entirely different situation; and that it was advanta- <br />geous for the Fire Department to have the Police Department respond first, for <br />safety considerations as well, followed by the Fire Department freeing the officer <br />from patient control until Allina responded to transport. <br />Acting Mayor Roe, in moving on to the Public Works Department, noted their <br />negative amount under unallocated. <br />Public Works Director Duane Schwartz advised that this was do to the way the <br />department tracked their information and broke down categories; and noted that, <br />as he was reviewing the information during tonight's meeting, may have found <br />several areas that were double-counted in that negative unallocated amount, and <br />needing correction. <br />Discussion specific to the Public Works Department included allocation of funds <br />for right-of--way maintenance in problem areas that were not the responsibility of <br />the City, but based on complaints and reduced maintenance operations of other <br />agencies (i.e., County and State) were handled by the City. <br />Further discussion on the need to distinguish tree maintenance by the Parks and <br />Recreation Department and the Public Works Department, with Public Works ad- <br />dressing tree canopies in public rights-of--way during the winter, and Parks and <br />Recreation addressing diseased and hazardous trees. <br />Councilmember Johnson opined the need for coordination of the two departments <br />on tree maintenance, removal and replacement. <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that the department was leveling off on mill and overlay of <br />pavements; however, on the utility side, that area was growing and was duly re- <br />flected in the CIP for a number of years. Mr. Schwartz anticipated an annual 3-4 <br />miles of mill and overlay of City streets, as well as some Minnesota State Aid <br />(MSA) maintenance requirements; and minimal reconstruction projects antici- <br />pated. <br />Parks and Recreation Director Lonnie Brokke noted the numerous, and often in- <br />ter-related services and program categories in his department; and the vital impact <br />made by community volunteers in delivery of services and programs. Mr. Brokke <br />noted that the department was 50-60% fee-supported, with revenues often inter- <br />related as well. Mr. Brokke advised that measurement procedures and levels of <br />service were in place based on surveys of all programs, as well as summary re- <br />ports and regular comment mechanisms. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.