My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1116
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2009 11:20:55 AM
Creation date
12/4/2009 11:20:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 16, 2009 <br />Page 10 <br />Councilmember Johnson questioned if regulating overtime more stringently could <br />impact the level of service; and how much that impact would be. <br />Mr. Miller responded affirmatively, noting that department by department, cutting <br />staffing resources would create service impacts. Mr. Miller advised that the City <br />Council could look at the current overtime policies as they moved into next year's <br />process to determine which performance measures should be developed. Mr. <br />Miller advised that the 2009 budget document line items included overtime by di- <br />vision, but had not been carried over into 2010. <br />Councilmember Johnson requested that staff provide the policies to him and fel- <br />low Councilmembers to allow them to discern what type of controls were perti- <br />nent and those that were not. <br />Councilmember Johnson addressed the final page of Attachment B-1 (line item <br />#58 -parks and recreation marketing); clarifying that this included the periodic <br />and seasonal community booklets on programming. Councilmember Johnson fur- <br />ther noted that the current budget represented no funding for outdoor skating <br />rinks, and a reduction in the Park Improvement Program (PIP). <br />City Manager Malinen clarified that, relative to the PIP, the 2009 program origi- <br />nally allotted $215,000, with no funding for diseased trees; however, the PIP was <br />reduced by $50,000 to address diseased trees; recommended to remain status quo <br />for 2010 to the adjusted 2009 budget at $165,000, with two (2) separate line <br />items. <br />Councilmember Johnson expressed his concern with that, opining that the PIP <br />should never be funded below $200,000; with the common misconception that <br />this is a capital account, when actually it was a maintenance account. Council- <br />member Johnson noted that the Parks Department struggled to maintain equip- <br />ment and facilities with that amount, let alone any further reduction; as well as his <br />concern that the Emerald Ash Borer problem may need to be addressed sooner <br />than anticipated, with only $50,000 currently allotted for diseased trees. Coun- <br />cilmember Johnson opined that healthy trees were part of a healthy, vibrant and <br />welcoming community, not just related to one specific department. <br />Councilmember Ihlan advised that, in her research of the City's website, she had <br />found the line item budget for 2009, under "Budget Work Papers" entitled # 1 and <br />#2, that included the details that she had in mind and consistent with past years. <br />Councilmember Roe clarified, and Mr. Miller confirmed, that the 2010 listing for <br />Vehicle and Equipment Replacement at $450,000 represented $340,000 just to get <br />back to 2008 levels, with the additional $110,000 to move toward adequate fund- <br />ing; and opined that this was not a lot if looking to offset costs and would do so at <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.