My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1116
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2009 11:20:55 AM
Creation date
12/4/2009 11:20:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 16, 2009 <br />Page 8 <br />a. Budget Discussion -Finalize 2010 Tax Levy and Budget <br />Finance Director Chris Miller briefly reviewed the Request for Council Action <br />dated November 16, 2009, detailing ongoing discussion on the 2010 recom- <br />mended budget; with City Council and staff rankings now segregated for the <br />benefit of citizens. <br />Mr. Miller advised that the public had been invited to tonight's meeting to provide <br />their feedback on priority rankings and the proposed City Manager-recommended <br />budget to-date. Mr. Miller provided a brief history of the rationale in changing <br />from the traditional and unsustainable traditional budget methodology to this <br />Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO) approach; attempting to correct structural issues <br />over several budget cycles, and to provide transparency for the public and a <br />greater breakdown of various programs and services, and the level of services ex- <br />pected by local taxpayers. <br />Mr. Miller reminded Councilmembers and the public that, in addition to antici- <br />pated 2010 expenses that were being held at 2009 adjusted budget levels, the City <br />would be experiencing a $450,000 loss in state aid for both 2009 and 2010, which <br />had been incorporated into the proposed 2010 budget. Mr. Miller briefly re- <br />viewed 2010 impacts and lack of funding related to capital replacement needs <br />(i.e., vehicle replacement); and pressures on all programs and services. <br />Councilmember Roe requested that staff provide clarification and a breakdown <br />for 2010 by individual department on Attachment A under the City Coun- <br />cil/Administration category those impacts that are spread throughout the various <br />departments (i.e., healthcare benefit increase; vehicle replacement across depart- <br />ments); and asked if this was available or still in progress. <br />Mr. Miller advised that those items in the 2010 City Council/Administration cate- <br />gory on Attachment A were not shown by division yet, but would be done once <br />final discussions had been completed. <br />Councilmember Ihlan reiterated previous requests at past meetings for a line item <br />budget corresponding with the City Manager-recommended budget and expendi- <br />ture summaries in Attachments A and B; and asked when that would be available <br />to the public and Councilmembers. <br />City Manager Malinen advised that Attachment B had been staff s response to <br />Councilmember Ihlan's request for inclusion and categorization of all other funds <br />providing that additional detail in each category (i.e., personnel, supplies). <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that Attachment A had helped, but that she was <br />looking for similar breakdowns as provided in previous budget years, with line <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.