My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0209_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0209_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:41:48 AM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:40:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting — O1/26/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 15 <br />Company for Roseville Parks and Recreation activities, <br />contingent upon review and approval by the City Attorney, <br />for a total value of $92,500; revised from the $97,500 as <br />listed in the staff report dated January 26,2004. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Schroeder, Maschka, Kough and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />316 Adopt a Resolution Approving 2004 Utility Rates <br />Councilmember Schroeder expressed concern about <br />seeking a five percent (5%) increase in water rates for <br />residents when negotiations were still pending with the St. <br />Paul Water Board; and what recourse was available if the <br />actual negotiated cost proved less than that percentage. <br />City Manager Beets responded that, under the current <br />arrangement, the City of Roseville paid a percentage of the <br />retail rate for St. Paul customers, and staff was aware that <br />the residential retail rate would be increasing, even though <br />unaware of the wholesale or retail percentage increase, <br />staff was projecting the conservative 5% increase, and <br />reconciliation could be made at a later date if warranted. <br />Mr. Beets further noted that he had been contacted by the <br />new Director of the St. Paul Water Board earlier today; <br />and the Board anticipated a response to the City's most <br />recent proposal by mid-February. Mr. Beets advised that <br />staff would be bringing forward additional information <br />related to capital projects and operational considerations as <br />part of the 2005 Budget cycle. Mr. Beets further advised <br />that revenues depended on water usage and sales, thus <br />always creating a system based on estimates. <br />Councilmember Maschka noted from a historical <br />perspective rates have been reduced in the past when <br />warranted after negotiations were completed. <br />Councilmember Kough noted that the City's goal was to <br />cover operating costs, with contingencies for system <br />improvements; and that the City was not looking to profit <br />Resolution 10191 <br />Approving 2004 <br />Utility Rates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.