Laserfiche WebLink
82 Ms. Antoinette Long, 1335 Oakcrest A��enue, submitted a petition from her and the <br />surrounding neighborhood opposing thc town home development. The petition, signed <br />by 94 residents, opposes any change to kh� existing zoning or designation of the property <br />as medium density residential (see �i[�c:h�� p�li �i�fn }. <br />8.3 Thirteen neighbors addressed the Plan ng Commission asking questions regarding the <br />proposed town home development and roviding comments regarding the proposal (see <br />attached minutes). <br />8.4 The Planning Commission voted �6�� �� recommend approval of the Comprehensive <br />Land Use Plan amendmentfrom Law Dcrt�ii}� Residential (LR) to Medium Density <br />Residential (NID) as consistentv�'ith lL�e R�s�wi�l� ComprehensivePlan policies as <br />identified in Section 5 of the pn�j ect r���r1 da�s�d I�i�r� h 4,2004; voted (6-0) to <br />recommend approval of the patieli�ir�ar�r plan �neatir�g �i�it town home lots and a <br />common lot, subj ect to the �c�ndi �i�,n� �,��c�l i n����i�n ? u �f the proj ect report dated March <br />4,2004; voted (6-0) to r��omm�r�r� a��ro+r�a �f th� r���ni ng from Single Family <br />Residence District �R- I� I,a Y�ann� �.�nit �cu��opm�Rk ��UL�� with an underlying zoning <br />of Town Home l7istri� t��-��; �nd �o� ���] t�o r�cr�eramcnd app��al of the General <br />Concept �'1 �nr��d U n is C�c��cl o�mc�i ��i n,cl�a�ivc� of al� �lan�] seeb�c�t to tC�c �a I �o,�+fi ag <br />conditions: <br />a Sidewalk (to the comer of �okcre�� and Hamline Avenues form the private drive) <br />must be included in the F��s�� ��ti�����m�n� Plan stage, which location depends on <br />the supported private ro��i �ccss, <br />b. The design of the town homes n��zst be compatible with the general context and <br />human scale of the neighborho°� for both architecture design and building <br />materials, including a hip roof �� lower overall height (if possible) and other <br />architectural elements to furthE� knhance each structure and reduce the visual <br />mass of the building, especiall� an the back side elevations.. <br />c. The Public Works Department inu�t complete the review and approve of the <br />�-�di r�g, clr;�i�$g,�, �r� utili�� gf�s pr�po�c� with the General Concept and Final <br />Pl�n .�u�m��tal, �l l�lar,�, �n�Judir�� t�:� ]�ti.��i�n of fire hydrants and utility <br />services connections, rc�quir� r,hc �p�r�,r�] �, � tY�� Public Works Department. The <br />Grass Lake ��s�rs�sed �slw� re4� ie�� .�nd st�pp��t storm water management for the <br />development. <br />d. Eight visitor parking spaces i7i �� be included in the developmentproposal, which <br />spaces can be a��arnniadated through the redesign of the private road, to include <br />}�ral le] parkin� ar 4� �i��r�e p�r�cin�. ���em��r Stone added to the motion: A <br />aar6c�r,� �l�n wlsi�E� wii] ir����mi�e �rkin� and reduce street pavement is to be <br />approved by the staf£) <br />PF3546 — RCA 032904 Page 10 of 12 <br />