My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0329_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0329_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 9:45:27 AM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:40:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />1 �h <br />]] <br />1� <br />13 <br />l� <br />« <br />upon the review and support of the Metropolitan Council. <br />Member Bakeman requested details of the setbacks within the proposal, especially along <br />the east side property line. She asked wheae the decks/patios may be placed. <br />Chair Mulder asked for details of the PUD process from Thomas Paschke. <br />Member Stone asked if site lighting will be reviewed by staf£ (Yes, prior to building <br />permit). A site lighting plan should be required. <br />Member Stone asked that the landscape plain be included. She asked what/where the <br />City's 2,600 + future homes to 2030 will be located. Thomas Paschke explained <br />locations of such proj ects (medium density) and design density. Chair Mulder noted he <br />lives in such a development. <br />t�5 Member Peper asked about hours of operation on week days and week ends. What is the <br />l� penalty for working outside the hours permitted? (The final regulations are placed in the <br />� � Planned Unit Development Agreement.) <br />l9 <br />�� <br />�1 <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�r <br />�� <br />�� <br />3� <br />3L <br />�� <br />3� <br />3� <br />�� <br />3� <br />�� <br />3� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�L <br />Chair Mulder asked if screening could be placed on the outer end of the private road and <br />on the pipeline easement. <br />Greg Stull, designed for Meadowview Homes, said the screening plan suggestions by the <br />staff are acceptable. At the neighborhood meeting, traffic was the primary concern. In <br />terms of screening, he proposed more coniferous pine trees. Site lighting will be <br />addressed. <br />Member Stone asked why there is no association. Mr. Stull said there will be a <br />homeowners' association. The association will be directed by the builder until the proj ect <br />is completed. <br />Member Ipsen asked if Hamline Avenue access was considered, south of the townhomes <br />along the easement. Mr. Stull explained the reasons for Oakcrest entry because of <br />pipelines. <br />Chair Mulder asked if the developer will work with neighbors on the landscape plan <br />(yes). Mr. Stull also will work on residential street lighting. <br />Member Peper asked how many were at the neighborhood meeting with the developer <br />(estimated at 28-30 residents). <br />�� Dr. Sadek Youssef, 1319 Willow Circle, asked if there is a hypothetical plan for five to <br />��� six houses. Thomas Paschke explained that four lots could be built without a road. <br />�4 However, with a cul-de-sac it could create a five-lot subdivision. Dr. Youssef asked if <br />�� storm water has been studied, the easement fills with water during heavy rains. Thomas <br />� Paschke noted that the proj ect must meet the water management requirements. Debra <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.