My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0517_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0517_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 3:15:34 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:41:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — 05/10/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 22 <br />Minor Subdivision of Property Consistent with the City Code Two-Lot Minor <br />(with NO Variance) at 3103 Asbury (PF 3556) Subdivision of <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke provided an overview of this Property <br />request for a lot line change in an existing lot line to create two (with NO Variance) <br />single-family parcels from the existing 40,000 square foot lot. at 3103 Asbury <br />Mr. Paschke noted that each parcel would meet or exceed all (PF 3556) <br />City lot size requirements. Mr. Paschke noted that, at the April <br />7, 2004 Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was <br />held with resulting unanimous Planning Commission <br />recommendation for denial of the request. Mr. Paschke that the <br />administrative request currently before the Council had been <br />revised to meet City Code requirements; and staff was thus <br />recommending approval. <br />Dan Wall, Attorney representing applicant Vernon <br />Albertson <br />Mr. Wall reviewed the nature of the request. Mr. Wall spoke to <br />several concerns in staff's list of conditions (Item. 3.8) restricting <br />variance or setback permits for future development of a principal <br />structure and/or accessory building on Parcel `B;" requesting its <br />removal to prevent adverse impacts on sale of the property. Mr. <br />Wall also expressed a preference that Items 3.9 and 3.10 be <br />removed as conditions, but was open to negotiation on those <br />points. <br />At this time, Mayor Klausing opened the meeting to public <br />comment related to this item. <br />Craig Churchward, 3093 N Asbury Street (immediately <br />south of property) <br />Mr. Churchward questioned procedure related to materials made <br />available for City Council review. <br />Mr. Paschke responded, at Mayor Klausing's direction, that the <br />information referenced by Mr. Churchward was related to the <br />previous request for a minor subdivision, and would not be <br />appropriate to forward that information with this new request. <br />Mr. Churchward expressed concern regarding comments from <br />Mr. Wall about the lack of public opposition evidenced by the <br />number of people in the audience representing was misleading, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.