2004_0524_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

County Road B-2 Pathway Public Meeting May 13,2004 Option 1 4ption 2 O tion 3 Option 4 None 1Nritten Comments If option 2 is chosen: I don't mind the idea of a 5' concrete sidewalk on my �roperty if I don't have to pay for it, i.e. no tax increase or special X assessments. If o tions 1 or 2 are not selected I would refer no action. X On north side Lex to Rice. 6 kids at best cross Lexington for school am-pm. X B2 traffic too, too fast for kids to be unattended. X I don't see the need for a sidewalk, not that many people use the street, most X o down to the ark. X Huge waste of tax payer dollars. Scrap the project! Deb - You present yourself as being for the pathway project...not as someone merely presenting a plan and getting feedback. You seem annoyed when {�eople present an opposing view rather than accepting them as valid opinions. Do not need sidewalks on both sides of the street, one side perhaps...for people walking as mode of transportation..people walking/biking etc. for recreation can use the parks and other recreation paths in place. Even if it means losing the federal funding, the strong consensus of most B2 residents and myself is that we do not need these excessive projects. Stop trying to make some project work just so you can get your federal funding. If we have to wait a few years for city-funded sidewalk, so be it. It would be a terrible shame to destroy a beautiful residential street...the trees...the lawns...to put in an ugly path. Let the money go back to the federal gov't so it �an be reallocated to another group who would want and appreciate the projects (or find a way to give it to the education system...where teachers are X bein cut and class sizes increased! We have enou h athwa s...B2 does All I hear is "must do it this way to meet the guidelines for federal funding"...interpretation "we �ill do whatever it takes to get the federal funding, no matter what" 7� 7 2 34 Total for each o tion 56 cards received :